ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Use this section to discuss "standard" Baader/Coronado/ Lunt SolarView/ Daystar, etc… filters, cameras and scopes. No mods, just questions/ answers and reviews.
Post Reply
User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3970
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 615 times
Contact:

ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by Merlin66 »

Any comment/ recommendations on either of these two cameras for full disk solar recording.
I realise the 183 with the larger chip will give more flexibility on telescope focal length, but I think at the price of over sampling with the 2.4micron pixel.
Any users out there????


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
MapleRidge
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 10173
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:58 pm
Location: Cambray, ON Canada
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 4302 times
Contact:

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by MapleRidge »

Hi Ken...

I don't have either of these cameras, but I do use the ASI290 with 2.9u pixels for planetary work and it works pretty nicely.

As for the two you mentioned they appear to be pretty much identical...same size pixels, same exposure range, not a lot of direct spectral response info on the ZWO site, but the 183 looks to be a scaled up array from the 178 chip. The 178 is listed as being 14 bit and the 183 is listed at 12 bit and both have rolling shutter. The ZWO site does not list read noise, QE, or full well capacity for the 178 and only states the noise for the 183. I'm sure they are listed d on the manufacturers data sheets, just no time to hunt them down right now.

The 183 should do well for full disk with focal lengths under 900mm which has a FOV 50' x 33' which will have poles hugging the edge of the field. For longer focal lengths you could bin to reduce over sampling and maybe gain some on the frame rate too.

I have not been happy with the ASI1600 I picked up 2 years ago...this might be an alternative option for doing full disks!!!

Brian


Brian Colville

Maple Ridge Observatory
Cambray, ON Canada

Photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185395281@N08/albums

10'x15 Roll-off Roof Observatory
Takahashi EM400 Mount carrying:
C14 + Lunt 80ED
Deep Sky Work - ASI294MM Pro+EFW 7x36/Canon 60D (Ha mod), ONAG
Planetary Work - SBIG CFW10, ASI462MM

2.2m Diameter Dome
iOptron CEM70G Mount carrying:
Orion EON 130ED, f7 OTA for Day & Night Use
Ha Setup: Lunt LS80PT/LS75FHa/B1200Ha + Home Brew Lunt Double Stack/B1800Ha on the Orion OTA + Daystar Quantum
WL, G-Band & CaK Setup: Lunt Wedge & Lunt B1800CaK, Baader K-Line and Altair 2nm G-Band filter
ASI1600MM, ASI432MM, ASI294MM Pro, ASI174MM, ASI462MM
User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3970
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 615 times
Contact:

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by Merlin66 »

Brian,
Thanks for that.
A reduced ROI with the 183 to the same fov as 178 seems to allow the same high frame rates....
Note: Binning doesn't appear to be an option on CMOS cameras :(


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
Valery
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 4059
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 893 times

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by Valery »

Hello Ken,

Are you sure you are so willing to spend a lot of money for a new camera to image a bald sun for a next couple of years untill the sun will start to awoke?

http://halpha.nso.edu/keep/hag/201802/2 ... 3830Ch.jpg

I believe that now is a time to image the sun locally, it's most interesting things like prominences, dark filaments and may be rare smaller spots. Needs at least 100mm of aperture.

When the sun will be active again and looks nicely, better or cheaper camers will be on the market for the sun portraits.


Valery
Last edited by Valery on Sat Feb 17, 2018 5:31 am, edited 1 time in total.


"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.

Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
User avatar
Valery
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 4059
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 893 times

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by Valery »

Merlin66 wrote: Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:07 am
Note: Binning doesn't appear to be an option on CMOS cameras :(
Why ?


"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.

Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3970
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 615 times
Contact:

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by Merlin66 »

To quote a reply I got:
""
Its the CMOS architecture. With CCD there is just one ADC. The electrons in each row are shifted down then on the bottom row, each pixel gets shifted to be read and digitised in the ADC. To bin 2x2, two rows are shifted down (and their electrons combined) and then two pixels get shifted to the read circuitry.

With CMOS there is an ADC on each row so the pixels on each row get shifted together to their respective read circuits and ADCs so there is no opportunity to combine the charges from each row before reading.
""
I agree things may be quiet for a while, but I still have opportunities with the multi-band Spectroheliograph.
My current options are the small QHY5Lii and the ASI 174MM. There's also the older DMK41 and the slooooow (doesn't like USB3) DMK51.


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
PDB
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 702
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:23 pm
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 149 times

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by PDB »

Hi,

I have the ASI178 mono and for planetary imaging with the C8 in the focal plane it is a good match (just slightly oversampled) . For solar work that cam gives me constant headaches due to square artifacts which always show up in the image. This seems to happen only in H-Alfa and also if I do some testing under LED light.

Paul


skywatcher1
The Sun?
The Sun?
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:19 pm

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by skywatcher1 »

ll.jpg
ll.jpg (152.46 KiB) Viewed 8753 times
Just joined, and my 178 arrives MONDAY


RKBerta
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 7:08 pm
Location: Michigan USA
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by RKBerta »

Bumping this thread to see if more people have experience with the ASI 183 for Ha Solar with DayStar Quark.....or other recommendations. Figure I will try to get info as the sun is entering cycle 25 and figure now is time to start getting info for comparison. The ASI 183 is currently on sale for $100 off normal price.


80mm f6 Officina Stellare APO triplet, 152mm Officina Stellare f8 APO triplet, TV 85mm f7 ED APO, 8" SCT HD, 11" SCT.
Astro Physics 900 and 1100 mounts, Ioptron MINI Tower Pro ALT/AZ mount, ZWO AM5 mount,
Lunt 60mm Ha single stack, Coronado 60mm Ha single stack with BF 30
Day Star Quark Chromosphere
Player One Neptune mono with 178 chip, 256mm DDR, tilt plane for solar imaging
ASI 071 Pro cooled color for DS imaging
ATIK 490 EX OSC for DS imaging
SBIG STL 6303e mono with RGBL and Ha, SII, OIII filters for DS imaging
ASI AIR Plus

JPL/NASA Solar System Ambassador
Michigan Scout observatory manager
User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3970
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 615 times
Contact:

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by Merlin66 »

Don't buy an ASI 183mm for solar imaging....
ZWO have acknowledged a "technical problem" with the ASI 183 when imaging in extreme narrow band ie solar Ha.

I bought one....and eventually ZWO accepted it back as part exchange on an ASI 1600MM. No issues with the ASI 1600MM.


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
pedro
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 12236
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 8:26 pm
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 6556 times
Contact:

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by pedro »

HI Ken

I use an ASI290MC for planetary imaging with good results. For the sun (FD imaging) I would recommend the ASI174MM (more expensive though)


User avatar
MalVeauX
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1853
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:58 pm
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 1142 times
Been thanked: 1329 times

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by MalVeauX »

Hello,

Full disc in one FOV, or mosaics?

The 2.4um pixel size makes a lot of sense for full disc images of the sun, but more appropriately will work with 400mm focal length (ASI178MM anyways) to get the FOV without doing a mosaic. The 183MM sensor size will allow a longer focal length, but with the same size pixel, you're not going to be doing anything differently with that long focal length as you end up using ROI just to do the same thing. So ultimately the 178MM is the better choice likely for full disc imaging at 2.4um with a short focal length, especially considering poor seeing.

I've used a 178 sensor for a while for solar and it was fine, both with a small aperture and short focal length and way oversampled with a 120mm aperture. I didn't have any pattern issues or anything, that has to do with drivers and stuff, the chip is fine for narrowband. At 6MP, they're not fast. But speed isn't needed for small image scale like full discs.

I plan on getting another 178MM soon specifically for full disc, and other imaging, with my ~F10 options.

Very best,


User avatar
MapleRidge
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 10173
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:58 pm
Location: Cambray, ON Canada
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 4302 times
Contact:

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by MapleRidge »

Hi Ken...

What are the odds of using the 173 chip successfully in WL and CaK? The limits in Ha make cameras based on this chip less desirable as a 3 band machine, but it would be good to know where it might fit for solar.

Brian


Brian Colville

Maple Ridge Observatory
Cambray, ON Canada

Photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185395281@N08/albums

10'x15 Roll-off Roof Observatory
Takahashi EM400 Mount carrying:
C14 + Lunt 80ED
Deep Sky Work - ASI294MM Pro+EFW 7x36/Canon 60D (Ha mod), ONAG
Planetary Work - SBIG CFW10, ASI462MM

2.2m Diameter Dome
iOptron CEM70G Mount carrying:
Orion EON 130ED, f7 OTA for Day & Night Use
Ha Setup: Lunt LS80PT/LS75FHa/B1200Ha + Home Brew Lunt Double Stack/B1800Ha on the Orion OTA + Daystar Quantum
WL, G-Band & CaK Setup: Lunt Wedge & Lunt B1800CaK, Baader K-Line and Altair 2nm G-Band filter
ASI1600MM, ASI432MM, ASI294MM Pro, ASI174MM, ASI462MM
User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3970
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 615 times
Contact:

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by Merlin66 »

Brian,
I assume you mean the ASI 174?
I've used it successfully at all wavelengths (CaH to Ha) but needed the tilter to suppress NR.

If you mean the ASI 183 - should be OK in white light but I think, based on the known issues, would suffer in CaK narrowband.


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
MapleRidge
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 10173
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:58 pm
Location: Cambray, ON Canada
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 4302 times
Contact:

Re: ZWO ASI 178 or 183 mono

Post by MapleRidge »

Hi Ken...

Yes, it was the 183 chip I was referring to. I wasn't sure if the problem was related to Ha specifically or any narrow band usage. I have used the 174 in all bands without any issues as well, and use a tilt adjuster in Ha as well.

Brian


Brian Colville

Maple Ridge Observatory
Cambray, ON Canada

Photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185395281@N08/albums

10'x15 Roll-off Roof Observatory
Takahashi EM400 Mount carrying:
C14 + Lunt 80ED
Deep Sky Work - ASI294MM Pro+EFW 7x36/Canon 60D (Ha mod), ONAG
Planetary Work - SBIG CFW10, ASI462MM

2.2m Diameter Dome
iOptron CEM70G Mount carrying:
Orion EON 130ED, f7 OTA for Day & Night Use
Ha Setup: Lunt LS80PT/LS75FHa/B1200Ha + Home Brew Lunt Double Stack/B1800Ha on the Orion OTA + Daystar Quantum
WL, G-Band & CaK Setup: Lunt Wedge & Lunt B1800CaK, Baader K-Line and Altair 2nm G-Band filter
ASI1600MM, ASI432MM, ASI294MM Pro, ASI174MM, ASI462MM
Post Reply