To Double stack, or not to Double stack

this is the main message area for anything solar :)
Post Reply
User avatar
Glosgas
The Sun?
The Sun?
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 5:51 pm

To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Glosgas »

Hi,

Forgive me, but I suspect this has been discussed somewhere in this Forum many times.

I have a Lunt LS60THa, single stack. I am really impressed with the images I get of the limb of the Sun and the detail on the surface. I was wondering if the benefit of Double stacking is worth the expense. As far as I understand the Double stack will provide better contrast for surface features. What are the views of the Forum members?


Steve.

Meade 12" LX200 (Classic), Canon 15x50 IS
Lunt LS60THα, B1200 Blocking Filter, Crayford Focuser, Pressure Tuner
User avatar
marktownley
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 42505
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
Location: Brierley Hills, UK
Has thanked: 20755 times
Been thanked: 10441 times
Contact:

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by marktownley »

Absolutely!


Image
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3972
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 619 times
Contact:

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Merlin66 »

The main gain in a DS is the dramatic improved contrast of the surface features, not so much so on proms.....


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
soulvagabond
Oh, I get it now!
Oh, I get it now!
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:20 pm
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by soulvagabond »

I doublestacked my Lunt 50 with the Daystar Quark, the difference in chromosphere details is phenomenal.
It's not only about the contrast improvement, but the image becomes a lot more 3 dimensional.
Sadly, the barlow of my Quark happened to be "dirty" and I get a lot of dust on the image, which I'm trying to solve atm.
I presume, DS-ing with the front mounted etalon is going to impress you a lot.
And then.. binoviewing supposed to bring it to the whole new level...


User avatar
Montana
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 34709
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
Location: Cheshire, UK
Has thanked: 17925 times
Been thanked: 8894 times

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Montana »

Once double stacked, you can never go back :)

You love the single stack, but then you go to double stack and find you were missing half the Sun. even the prominences are better as they become beautiful 3D :hamster:

It does take some time to get used to setting it up though ;)
Alexandra


Philament
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:58 pm

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Philament »

I think it depends on the sky clarity where you are. If I had the choice, I would prefer to replace my single-stack PST with a single-stack 60mm 'scope than a double-stacked PST.


User avatar
pedro
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 12318
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 8:26 pm
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 6685 times
Contact:

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by pedro »

I tried double stacking several times and I still prefer single stack images...

Haven't tried the Quark yet though


User avatar
marktownley
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 42505
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
Location: Brierley Hills, UK
Has thanked: 20755 times
Been thanked: 10441 times
Contact:

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by marktownley »

Ha ha ha! Everyone has different preferences! Funny! :D


Image
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
User avatar
Carbon60
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 14294
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
Location: Lancashire, UK
Has thanked: 8523 times
Been thanked: 8253 times

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Carbon60 »

Definitely DS when you're ready to make the investment. I use a Lunt 60 THa pressure tuned, fitted with a DS module (tilt tuned, front mounted) and although it takes a bit of getting used to, the views are excellent for FDs.

Stu.


H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Derek Klepp
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 12900
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:02 am
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Derek Klepp »

I would say for eyepiece viewing it is worth it.


brianm910
Oh, I get it now!
Oh, I get it now!
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 5:30 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC USA

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by brianm910 »

I have the Lunt 60 as well, I've been viewing and taking photos in single stack, however when I screw on my second filter my images disappear and I can't view anything at all. So, please tell me what I should do after I double stack in order to get images come up in Fire Cap. Increase my exposure all the way? I can't even see anything through my eye piece. I'm sure someone can tell me how to do this. I'm using a ASI ZWO 174mm camera too.Thank you!


User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3972
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 619 times
Contact:

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Merlin66 »

Hmmm
The DS intensity is usually around 60% the single stack - still bright enough for general viewing/ imaging.
Just check the second filter - hold it up and look at the sun through it....
It obviously need to be tuned to match the single stack to achieve maximum transmission, but even un tuned you should still see something...
(you have removed all the covers? ;-) )


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
brianm910
Oh, I get it now!
Oh, I get it now!
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 5:30 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC USA

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by brianm910 »

Thank you, yes I have removed the covers. :) Let me try holding it up to the sun an tune it. I'm assuming turning the tuner will cause some kind of clarity? I had no idea how to use it when I bought it, I was told there is an advantage to having it. I turned up my exposure one time and got some image but not clear.


User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3972
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 619 times
Contact:

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Merlin66 »

Hmmm
OK Holding and looking through will just ensure there are no "blockages"....basic stuff.
Tune and focus the single stack to give the best clarity, brightest image you can get.
Don't touch the single stack tuning.
Add the double stack and adjust the tilt to give the brightest image.
That should get you very close as a starting point.
Any additional "tuning" just use the front tilt adjuster. Refocus as necessary....
As mentioned the image will be fainter than single stack and the exposures a little longer.


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
Montana
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 34709
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
Location: Cheshire, UK
Has thanked: 17925 times
Been thanked: 8894 times

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Montana »

Just a thought, when you add the double stack the telescope doesn't sag does it? on my PST when I add my double stack to it, the Merlin mount droops a bit (as it is heavier on the end) and the Sun just drops out of the eyepiece, I always have to lift it a little to get the Sun back in view. Fractional but enough for the camera to go dark.

Alexandra


User avatar
GUS
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Katoomba,NSW,Australia
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by GUS »

I have the LS60 with the DS60F front filter and use the ASI174 as well and have no issues. If you set it up for visual as Ken( Merlin66) explined above, and you can see the sun, you should have no issue when connecting the camera.


brianm910
Oh, I get it now!
Oh, I get it now!
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 5:30 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC USA

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by brianm910 »

Well, I got a bit closer. I screwed on my double stack today. I did get a good view through the eyepiece. Not clear but it was there. So, I took a video and stacked it. Here is the photo I got. What do I need to do differently? My investment in the double stack is not paying off yet, lol.
Attachments
Sun March 4 Double Stack.jpg
Sun March 4 Double Stack.jpg (286.84 KiB) Viewed 3098 times


astro1949
Oh, I get it now!
Oh, I get it now!
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:13 pm
Location: upstate NY
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by astro1949 »

your DS filter is not good-- mine did that and I sent it back to LUNT -- it was de-contacted........


Bob

Lunt 60 PT DS Meade 14" LX200 GPS SV 80mm F/7 SV 102MM F/11 ETX 125 10" F/5.5 Newt.
Celestron 5MP Orion 6MP V2 ZWO 174CC 178C 224C
User avatar
marktownley
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 42505
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
Location: Brierley Hills, UK
Has thanked: 20755 times
Been thanked: 10441 times
Contact:

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by marktownley »

Ouch! That's not good, that's a decontact...


Image
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
Philament
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:58 pm

Re: To Double stack, or not to Double stack

Post by Philament »

Occasionally, DSS gives me a similar pattern when I stack constellations or DSOs.


Post Reply