Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:41 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Finally salvaged what I could from almost 1Tb of data in total.
Some better than others & like most people wishing for better seeing to come.
Thought I would try some processing left field, not everyone's taste but feedback appreciated.
Thanks for looking.
Some better than others & like most people wishing for better seeing to come.
Thought I would try some processing left field, not everyone's taste but feedback appreciated.
Thanks for looking.
- Albuqshutterbug
- Almost There...
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:04 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Those first 3 shots are outrageously great!
Wow the detail and even flow is gorgeous.
I love all the shots but those first three make me droll.
Well done.
Wow the detail and even flow is gorgeous.
I love all the shots but those first three make me droll.
Well done.
Lunt pressure tuned 60mm with 1200 blocking filter.
And Baader 5D solar film filters for all of my lenses and telescopes.
For Imaging:
Celestron Skyris 236M and 236C
Canon 7D, Canon 5D Mark II and Canon T2i IR Modified
And Baader 5D solar film filters for all of my lenses and telescopes.
For Imaging:
Celestron Skyris 236M and 236C
Canon 7D, Canon 5D Mark II and Canon T2i IR Modified
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 7:51 pm
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Those first 3 really are works of art - amazing
Steve
Technosky 152 with 135mm D-ERF + Quark
PST Evostar & Tal 100 mod with 100mm D-ERF
SM60II SM40 +Ickharus 102 + 10mm BF
Lunt 50 DS PG Grasshopper 3
White Light stuff - not yet used...
Technosky 152 with 135mm D-ERF + Quark
PST Evostar & Tal 100 mod with 100mm D-ERF
SM60II SM40 +Ickharus 102 + 10mm BF
Lunt 50 DS PG Grasshopper 3
White Light stuff - not yet used...
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42550
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20819 times
- Been thanked: 10489 times
- Contact:
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Cool pics Ewan!
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:45 pm
- Location: Sydney Australia
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Nicely done. I like the interpretation of your data by your processing that focuses on the plasma "flows". Repeated use of sharpening then smoothing filters delivers a nice liquid like feel. Like you say not to all people tastes but just another interesting way to look at the data.
Ted
Ted
Lunt LS80THa DSII Quark Prominence ES127mm refractor
- ffellah
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 11308
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:46 pm
- Location: Westport, CT USA
- Has thanked: 9326 times
- Been thanked: 6158 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
That is a truly amazing set, Ewan. The plasma lines in the first three images are incredibly smooth. Well done.
Franco
Franco
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
I like image #9 from 08 04 2017. Good real details.
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- Carbon60
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 14314
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: Lancashire, UK
- Has thanked: 8559 times
- Been thanked: 8291 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
More art than science, but beautiful nevertheless. No harm in experimenting and offering something a bit different.
I bet the first two look stunning coloured.
Stu.
I bet the first two look stunning coloured.
Stu.
H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 12900
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:02 am
- Been thanked: 171 times
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:41 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
I am probably pushing the limit of the 152mm Valery I know that. Seeing in some were very fortunate & lucky. Tried a lot of different capture settings & found some good ones. I also extended the dew shield with the D-ERF on it, not sure if that made a difference than being closed though, any thoughts ?
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:41 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Thank you for the kind comments. I did say not everyone's taste but trying different things is in my nature. I shall give the 1st 3 some colour as suggested & see if it will go on a wall somewhere.
Atb
Atb
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34722
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17974 times
- Been thanked: 8906 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
I nearly fell off my chair in shock, the first 2 images are to die for, I love it : they are like smooth velvety liquid chocolate....mmmmm
Alexandra
Alexandra
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:41 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Thanks Alexandra, with so few & far between opportunities for solar work at the mo I was bored so tried something else, makes for a change I guess. Hope your capturing plenty your end.
Atb
- pedro
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 12320
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 8:26 pm
- Location: Portugal
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 6691 times
- Contact:
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Nice shots Ewan
Can you tell us more on your image processing flow
Can you tell us more on your image processing flow
Pedro Re'
https://pedroreastrophotography.com/
https://pedroreastrophotography.com/
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 12:12 am
- Location: Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada
- Been thanked: 1735 times
- Contact:
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Hi, Ewan
I had to add my admiration for your work here. The first 3 are stunning and whatever your technique involves, you should continue with it.
The detail in the more "standard" looking images is outstanding.
Lou
I had to add my admiration for your work here. The first 3 are stunning and whatever your technique involves, you should continue with it.
The detail in the more "standard" looking images is outstanding.
Lou
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42550
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20819 times
- Been thanked: 10489 times
- Contact:
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
I'm guessing you're actually running at 125mm here, measure the free diameter of the ERF. Its a 135mm DERF and some of it has to be held within the perimeter of the cell.Ewan wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:30 am I am probably pushing the limit of the 152mm Valery I know that. Seeing in some were very fortunate & lucky. Tried a lot of different capture settings & found some good ones. I also extended the dew shield with the D-ERF on it, not sure if that made a difference than being closed though, any thoughts ?
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:41 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
It's using 135mm which puts me around F28 ish I think. Was wondering what difference, if any, having the dew shield up / down made apart from maybe scope balance.marktownley wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:05 pmI'm guessing you're actually running at 125mm here, measure the free diameter of the ERF. Its a 135mm DERF and some of it has to be held within the perimeter of the cell.Ewan wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:30 am I am probably pushing the limit of the 152mm Valery I know that. Seeing in some were very fortunate & lucky. Tried a lot of different capture settings & found some good ones. I also extended the dew shield with the D-ERF on it, not sure if that made a difference than being closed though, any thoughts ?
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42550
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20819 times
- Been thanked: 10489 times
- Contact:
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
It will make no difference at all the position of the dew shield.Ewan wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:53 pmIt's using 135mm which puts me around F28 ish I think. Was wondering what difference, if any, having the dew shield up / down made apart from maybe scope balance.marktownley wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:05 pmI'm guessing you're actually running at 125mm here, measure the free diameter of the ERF. Its a 135mm DERF and some of it has to be held within the perimeter of the cell.Ewan wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:30 am I am probably pushing the limit of the 152mm Valery I know that. Seeing in some were very fortunate & lucky. Tried a lot of different capture settings & found some good ones. I also extended the dew shield with the D-ERF on it, not sure if that made a difference than being closed though, any thoughts ?
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34722
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17974 times
- Been thanked: 8906 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
It's a Marmite moment some love it some hate it, but I just keep having to come back for another look
Alexandra
Alexandra
- eroel
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 9444
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:45 pm
- Location: México D.F.
- Been thanked: 4980 times
Re: Quark selection not very good seeing sorry
Ewan:
Very good images, specially #9.
Best regards,
Eric.
Very good images, specially #9.
Best regards,
Eric.