Just a full disc today, there is little to see on the chromosphere and nothing on the photosphere apart some facular zones. I noticed some prominences in calcium light but sky is hazy today and images would be too noisy. I also add an image of AR12721 taken on Sept. 10th before the group lost all of its spots.
After some tests I decided not to use anymore of IMPPG for processing calcium images, I have the impression that it likely generates small scale artifacts, for the below image I used of IRIS instead.
Ca-H full disc of Sept. 13th
- krakatoa1883
- Almost There...
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 9:41 am
- Location: Mediolanum
- Has thanked: 153 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Ca-H full disc of Sept. 13th
- Attachments
-
- 2018-09-10-1443-RB-CaH-AR12721.jpg (85.52 KiB) Viewed 1362 times
-
- 2018-09-13-0830-RB-CaH-fulldisc.jpg (99.65 KiB) Viewed 1367 times
Raf
My solar images and reports with articles on solar equipment
My solar images and reports with articles on solar equipment
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34722
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17974 times
- Been thanked: 8906 times
Re: Ca-H full disc of Sept. 13th
I agree, I don't use IMPGG for CaK either. I have never really settled on what I like but AstraImage is what I usually turn to. I find IMPGG seems to create tiny dots which I am not sure is correct. I try to study the video as close as I can, then try and replicate what you see in processing, the eye never lies and is usually the best judge.
These are excellent photos
Alexandra
These are excellent photos
Alexandra
- ffellah
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 11303
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:46 pm
- Location: Westport, CT USA
- Has thanked: 9319 times
- Been thanked: 6157 times
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: Ca-H full disc of Sept. 13th
Nice images, Raf.
I agree about ImPPG. I'm always worried it leaves small scale artifacts with CaK. I use ImagesPlus .. very slow but, I think, more reliable deconvolution.
Cheers.
Peter
I agree about ImPPG. I'm always worried it leaves small scale artifacts with CaK. I use ImagesPlus .. very slow but, I think, more reliable deconvolution.
Cheers.
Peter
- krakatoa1883
- Almost There...
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 9:41 am
- Location: Mediolanum
- Has thanked: 153 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Ca-H full disc of Sept. 13th
Thanks everyone.
I never used ImagesPlus, I'll try, thanks Peter for your suggestion.
I never used ImagesPlus, I'll try, thanks Peter for your suggestion.
Raf
My solar images and reports with articles on solar equipment
My solar images and reports with articles on solar equipment
- eroel
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 9444
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:45 pm
- Location: México D.F.
- Been thanked: 4980 times
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42545
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20813 times
- Been thanked: 10485 times
- Contact:
Re: Ca-H full disc of Sept. 13th
Good shots Raf!
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!