The Charlie Bates Solar Astronomy Project is proudly sponsored by the following fine companies:
ImageImageImageImage
Image
Image
Lou took this great image of a prom with his Lunt152 double stacked with a Quark

Welcome to Solar Chat! The best forum for Solar Astronomy
Moving forward from solar cycle 24 to 25

Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

this is the main message area for anything solar :)
Post Reply
User avatar
Martin_S
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 12:34 am
Location: Brisbane , Australia

Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by Martin_S » Fri May 10, 2019 10:19 am

rs3.jpg
rs3.jpg (60.62 KiB) Viewed 702 times
rs2.jpg
rs2.jpg (47.04 KiB) Viewed 702 times
rs1.jpg
rs1.jpg (13.52 KiB) Viewed 702 times
Yesterday was my first opportunity in over 2 weeks to get my Lunt LS60tHa out for some Imaging the clouds were rolling in fast so I had to quickly take these images.I tried some white light Imaging for the first time with my Skywatcher Evostar ED72 .5 focal reducer and ASI 120mm-s camera. I stacked 100 frames as the seeing was good at the time. I would like to do better Imaging in White light. I do have a Celestron 6SE SCT . I could use , would this scope with filters achieve better results. Thanks for looking, any suggestions would be most welcome
Martin
rs4.jpg
rs4.jpg (49.55 KiB) Viewed 700 times

bart1805
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 9:04 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by bart1805 » Fri May 10, 2019 11:05 am

Hi Martin,
Yes, you would get better results: bigger aperture.
You would need the Baader ND3.8 Astrosolar. This is just for imaging, not visual.
You can buy a complete filter or a sheet of Astrosolar. Then you would have to make your own holder.
BTW: nice images, that 2741 is a real beauty.
CS! Bart.

User avatar
Martin_S
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 12:34 am
Location: Brisbane , Australia

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by Martin_S » Fri May 10, 2019 11:24 am

Hi Bart, thank you for your reply, how much definition do you loose using a visual filter as opposed to an imaging filte?r, there is a Celetron filter at a good price on E-bay right now
Martin

bart1805
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 9:04 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by bart1805 » Fri May 10, 2019 11:50 am

Can't tell you that. I suppose it is a ND5.0 filter made out of glass? Then your exposure time would be substantially longer. So more effect of the seeing.
Normally only quite expensive glass filters can compete with the advantages of Astrosolar.

User avatar
Montana
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 20866
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
Location: Cheshire, UK

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by Montana » Fri May 10, 2019 12:53 pm

Fantastic images :hamster: :bow

As regards white light, Baader solar film is optically much better quality than any glass filter, unless the glass is very expensive indeed. I tried Baader ND5 filter on my Celestron C11 and there was not enough light to image with. The exposure times were so long it was not worth trying. I now use ND3.8 and the exposure times are fast enough to take images. Also what is a must is to use a UV/IR block filter on your camera as the out of focus light makes your WL images blurred. This makes a huge difference to focus. Also a Continuum filter helps a lot too to improve contrast.

Alexandra

User avatar
PDB
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 518
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:23 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by PDB » Fri May 10, 2019 1:08 pm

Hi Martin,

can confirm the ND3.8 gives much better results than the ND5. I have been using the ND5 in my C8 at prime focus and this still ok, but adding extra filters (baader continuum ...) will make exposure to slow. Also if adding any barlow to increase f/ratio will need the 3.8. (ND 3.8 is difficult to find nowadays for larger apertures, think the largest size sold now is A4 format)

Looking at the white light images think you also can get a better resolution. Did I read correctly you are using a .5 reducer on the Skywatcher? That will
give you an F/3 ratio which is WAY undersampled with the ASI120MM-S having 3.75µ pixels. Maybe a 2x or 2.5x barlow would give a better match between telescope and camera.

Regards,

Paul

User avatar
Martin_S
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 12:34 am
Location: Brisbane , Australia

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by Martin_S » Fri May 10, 2019 9:14 pm

Thank you Paul and Alexandra , I now have some good points to work on.

Martin

User avatar
marktownley
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 26264
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
Location: Brierley Hills, UK
Contact:

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by marktownley » Sun May 12, 2019 3:22 pm

Nice shots!
Image
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!

User avatar
MapleRidge
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 5925
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:58 pm
Location: Cambray, ON Canada

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by MapleRidge » Sun May 12, 2019 3:28 pm

Hi Martin...

A nice set of images!!!

Brian
Brian Colville

Maple Ridge Observatory

Cambray, ON Canada

User avatar
Martin_S
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 12:34 am
Location: Brisbane , Australia

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by Martin_S » Tue May 14, 2019 10:14 am

Thank you , Mark and Brian

User avatar
Martin_S
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 12:34 am
Location: Brisbane , Australia

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by Martin_S » Tue Jul 16, 2019 10:10 am

Thought I'd give this thread a recap, I had poor results on my first attempt at white light Imaging. This is my second attempt taken today . I used my ED72 and my ASI120mm camera at prime focus,5.0 solar film El-cheapo IR cut filter and an El-cheapo Wratten #58 green filter. Post processing AS!2 and registax.
I can actually see some surface detail. Next time I'll use some slight focal reduction to fit the full disc to the sensor.

Martin
Attachments
Proms_135424_Exposure=3.jpg
Proms_135424_Exposure=3.jpg (131.25 KiB) Viewed 370 times

User avatar
krakatoa1883
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 505
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 9:41 am
Location: Mediolanum

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by krakatoa1883 » Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:47 am

Good result, granulation is evident. With a 0.5x focal reducer you can image the full disc.
Raf
My solar images and reports with articles on solar equipment

User avatar
Montana
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 20866
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
Location: Cheshire, UK

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by Montana » Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:35 pm

An excellent second attempt :hamster:
Alexandra

User avatar
Martin_S
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 12:34 am
Location: Brisbane , Australia

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by Martin_S » Tue Jul 16, 2019 8:59 pm

Thank you Raf and Alexandra . I bought 2 cheap filters after reading this article

http://www.schursastrophotography.com/s ... icle3.html


Martin

User avatar
Carbon60
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 6252
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
Location: Lancashire, UK

Re: Solar Images taken May 9th 2019 and a question.

Post by Carbon60 » Wed Jul 17, 2019 5:36 am

Looking better there, Martin.

Stu.
Lunt LS60THa B1200 PTFT
150mm H-alpha Solar telescope with Lunt35 mod
DMK41, Basler acA1920-155
NEQ6 Pro-mount
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence)
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/

Post Reply