Lunt LS50THa modification to 200 mm aperture

[GreatAttractor]

I present my latest Hα mod, consisting of a GSO Ritchey-Chretien 8" + Aries 214 mm ERF + Lunt 50 etalon assembly. I completed it back in June, but unfortunately haven't had conditions and time for an imaging session yet (beside basic testing). I'm planning on putting it to good use next year.

The mod is similar to the previous one. The OTA is f/8, so close to Lunt 50's native f/7, and has a generous backfocus, so no telescope modification was needed. I measured the correct etalon distance the same way as in the 90 mm mod, and had an adapter ring made:

adring.jpg (94.97 KiB) Viewed 313 times

The adapter attaches to a (GSO) 50 mm extension ring.

The ERF cell's collar fits the OTA opening of a C8 and is a bit too wide for RC8. But here I have twin hollow dovetails with convenient threaded holes, so I just cut two aluminium strips (2 mm thick) and drilled and tapped holes in the cell for them:

dtail.jpg (101.24 KiB) Viewed 313 times

cell.jpg (92.65 KiB) Viewed 313 times

cellhole.jpg (93.52 KiB) Viewed 313 times

Of course the mounting screws are short enough not to touch the glass.
The strips are long enough to allow tilting (I must check in good seeing how much of it is needed):

cellota.jpg (81.91 KiB) Viewed 313 times

At the back is my usual optical train: some T2 extenders and a Borg T2 non-rotating helical focuser:

full.jpg (134.54 KiB) Viewed 313 times

I did some basic tests, verifying focus, uniformity and sweet-spot size: everything as expected. Disk contrast is somewhat lower than with the 90 mm refractor (and SS Lunt 50 is not very contrasty to begin with), but post-processing can handle it. With my 1.6x Barlow and ICX445 sensor I needed around 1.35 ms exposure (no gain) to fill the histogram in the middle of the disk (~0.7 ms on the refractor).

I also tested white light; the ERF has some residual visual spectrum transmission outside Hα, and to get close to a ND 3.8 solar film config I used a Baader 1.25" ND 1.8 (1.5%) + Solar Continuum filters, giving me a few ms exposure at the disk center.

Seeing conditions were poor, but I had a few glimpses of the fine structures around an active region, and also in a small prominence - looks very promising. (Too little for stacking, though.)

[MalVeauX]

Very interesting, can't wait to see how it turns out and how it performs! Gives a lot of promise to some future mods.

Do you think its possible to do something with a focal-reducer to get to F6.3 on a standard C8? Pretty close to the native focal-ratio right?

Very best,

[GreatAttractor]

I would fear the back focus would be insufficient (Lunt 50 needs some ~180 mm). With an SCT it would be easier to simply attach a PST (which works at f/10).

[MalVeauX]

Hrm,

I was just thinking of quality difference between a 50mm Lunt etalon and a PST etalon for this purpose. If the SCT would need lots of back focus with a focal-reducer with a 50mm Lunt Etalon, couldn't extensions provide that back focus without much issue?

Very best,

[marktownley]

You need back focus with both. No such thing as a free lunch in solar Marty. Back focus goes in not out.

[MalVeauX]

You need back focus with both. No such thing as a free lunch in solar Marty. Back focus goes in not out.

I guess I'm confused with the language... back focus referring to travel distance into the OTA?

Very best,

[GreatAttractor]

Back focus = distance from the rear of the OTA to the OTA's focal plane. Etalons, telecentrics etc. need to be inside this distance. RC has quite a lot, SCT somewhat less, and adding a focal reducer moves the focal plane in, so reduces back focus.

[MalVeauX]

Thanks! Makes sense

Very best,