Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Use this section to discuss "standard" Baader/Coronado/ Lunt SolarView/ Daystar, etc… filters, cameras and scopes. No mods, just questions/ answers and reviews.
Post Reply
User avatar
GUS
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Katoomba,NSW,Australia
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by GUS »

Is the Atik 314L+ any good for solar.I would be using it with an LS 60 PT and Coronado SM 40.What about some of the other Atik cameras.


User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3972
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 619 times
Contact:

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by Merlin66 »

GUS,
I have and use the ATik314L for spectroscopy. I also have the ATik 16ic and ATik16icS.
IMHO not suitable for solar imaging.....
You really need to consider a mono video type camera, fast frame rate (to freeze the seeing) and the ability to take and stack AVI files for maximum quality.....
The DMK series is still popular and the new CMOS QHY5L-II and ASI 130 cameras are giving interesting results.


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
swisswalter
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 17948
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
Location: Switzerland
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by swisswalter »

Hi GUS

black and White, big and fast, that is the way to go


Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE :)

from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch

from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa ;)
User avatar
GUS
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Katoomba,NSW,Australia
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by GUS »

Thanks Merlin & walter.Out of curiosity is the Atik 314L+ similar to the lunt solar imager, they seem to have similar specs.


User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3972
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 619 times
Contact:

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by Merlin66 »

GUS,
You are indeed correct!
For the life of me I don't know why Lunt would recommend such a cooled CCD camera for solar imaging!!
I can't remember see any "solar" images from this camera...
Anyone have some examples?????

(Edit:)
Found this thread with images....
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/ ... in/6506475
and from the Master
http://www.stephenramsden.com/solarastr ... index.html


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
GUS
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Katoomba,NSW,Australia
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by GUS »

Thanks Merlin, LSI images from Steven look great. have you had similar results with the Atik 314 L+.Are there any images with the zwo 130 on this forum.


User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3972
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 619 times
Contact:

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by Merlin66 »

Gus,
I only use my ATiK314L for spectroscopy.
The DMK gets used for solar...


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
GUS
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Katoomba,NSW,Australia
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by GUS »

OK, thanks Merlin.


User avatar
_Zakalwe
Im an EXPERT!
Im an EXPERT!
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:54 am
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by _Zakalwe »

The slow framerate would mean that in a given period of time you aren't getting that many frames to stack. it takes 2 seconds to download a frame...in comparison a mono planetary camera would have captured over 100 frames in that time. That makes a big difference when it comes to stacking.

Fine solar details can and do change quickly over time....granulation cells refresh in about 5 minutes, don't they?

The big advantage would be it's 16-bit image depth. That should make it a great tool for dragging out faint prominence detail even when imaging the main disc.

I guess that the ideal imaging weapon would be a 16 bit camera capable of running at about 60fps?


User avatar
GUS
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Katoomba,NSW,Australia
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by GUS »

Thanks Zakalwe.


User avatar
Peter Williams
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:06 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by Peter Williams »

GUS wrote:Thanks Merlin, LSI images from Steven look great. have you had similar results with the Atik 314 L+.Are there any images with the zwo 130 on this forum.
Yes, here is a thread I started about my experience with a ZWO ASI130MM
http://solarchat.natca.net/viewtopic.ph ... o+asi130mm


Beginner amateur astronomer, keen on solar astronomy.
User avatar
GUS
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Katoomba,NSW,Australia
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by GUS »

Thanks Peter,looks like i will look for another camera then.


User avatar
Peter Williams
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:06 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by Peter Williams »

Definitely Gus, the ZWO are no good for narrow-band, but OK for white light, it's a shame as they are inexpensive. I ended up getting a PGR Grasshopper 3 with the Sony ICX687 sensor. No solar pics from it yet, clouds & rain since purchase.


Beginner amateur astronomer, keen on solar astronomy.
User avatar
GUS
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Katoomba,NSW,Australia
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by GUS »

Thanks Peter,did you buy from a local dealer or direct from point grey.

Thanks again.


User avatar
Peter Williams
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:06 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by Peter Williams »

Gus, direct from Pt Grey, you create an account & login to their web store, no official dealers in Australia that I know of.
Ordered Sunday night & had it on Thursday by FedEx.


Beginner amateur astronomer, keen on solar astronomy.
User avatar
GUS
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Katoomba,NSW,Australia
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Re: Atik 314L+.Any good for solar?

Post by GUS »

Thanks Peter,will try that.


Post Reply