Beloptik to stack a Quark
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 9:29 am
- Location: Dunfermline , Scotland
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Beloptik to stack a Quark
I asked Oliver about using one of these to stack a Quark
( Beloptik H-alpha bandpass filter FWHM 1.5A 0.15nm )
and about image brightness for visual use....and received the following
response back today
Dear Brian,
Yes I can do it. My personally experience with some Quark's (4pcs) are not so good. The quality of the Quark is too different in bandpass/FWHM and brightness. I do not recommend it.
Clear skies
Oliver
So very honest of him ... are there any other cheap methods of stacking
a quark for visual use at all ?
Thanks .... Brian
( Beloptik H-alpha bandpass filter FWHM 1.5A 0.15nm )
and about image brightness for visual use....and received the following
response back today
Dear Brian,
Yes I can do it. My personally experience with some Quark's (4pcs) are not so good. The quality of the Quark is too different in bandpass/FWHM and brightness. I do not recommend it.
Clear skies
Oliver
So very honest of him ... are there any other cheap methods of stacking
a quark for visual use at all ?
Thanks .... Brian
" Gentlemen only ever use Refractors "
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42524
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20783 times
- Been thanked: 10469 times
- Contact:
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
yes, use a PST etalon straight behind it in the quarks ep holder - no collimating lens, no refocusing lens in the pst etalon assembly.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 9:29 am
- Location: Dunfermline , Scotland
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Ok Thanks Mark
I do have a PST but I'm not sure about pulling one apart again !
I can remember having one in the vice with one of those grips in 06
Will have a wee think though
Brian
I do have a PST but I'm not sure about pulling one apart again !
I can remember having one in the vice with one of those grips in 06
Will have a wee think though
Brian
" Gentlemen only ever use Refractors "
- DSobserver
- Almost There...
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 2:36 pm
- Location: FRANCE
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Mark, Brian,
I try to double stack my quark plus PST without lens....It's, it's...amazing!!!!!
Double stack with my new 152 scope!!!!
I also try it with a 70/400 scope : focuser was weak, but amazing view too!
I'll post tomorrow some pictures of this!
Thanks Mark for your idea! (did you try it before?)
I try to double stack my quark plus PST without lens....It's, it's...amazing!!!!!
Double stack with my new 152 scope!!!!
I also try it with a 70/400 scope : focuser was weak, but amazing view too!
I'll post tomorrow some pictures of this!
Thanks Mark for your idea! (did you try it before?)
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
My experience of staking Quark and PST etalon was rather poor . My Quark is good and bright enough for
a Quark. My PST etalon is also very bright.
However together they are VERY dim. I need to increase gain and still the exposure is about 40-50ms !
May be it is useable for a very good seeing. But not for average conditions.
Valery.
a Quark. My PST etalon is also very bright.
However together they are VERY dim. I need to increase gain and still the exposure is about 40-50ms !
May be it is useable for a very good seeing. But not for average conditions.
Valery.
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- DSobserver
- Almost There...
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 2:36 pm
- Location: FRANCE
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
PST+Quark results are bad.
But quark +PST without lens = 10/10!
Again and again either PST or quark, quality is very versatile....and results too!
But quark +PST without lens = 10/10!
Again and again either PST or quark, quality is very versatile....and results too!
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 9:29 am
- Location: Dunfermline , Scotland
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Hi Guys
I've not gotten my head round this yet ... using a PST etalon to stack a Quark
Can you please post a pic or diagram of the configuration
My main concern would be image brightness for visual use
Thanks ... Brian
I've not gotten my head round this yet ... using a PST etalon to stack a Quark
Can you please post a pic or diagram of the configuration
My main concern would be image brightness for visual use
Thanks ... Brian
" Gentlemen only ever use Refractors "
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
I did exactly so as you and Mark described. The results are rather poor - vignetting and a very dim image.DSobserver wrote:
But quark +PST without lens = 10/10!
!
I tested this extensively during two sessions and then I quit and never tried this again as this is just time waste.
Valery.
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42524
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20783 times
- Been thanked: 10469 times
- Contact:
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
I got the same Valery, my images were vignetted. But, visually the results were very impressive offering a lot more contrast on the native quark. I just haven't had the clear skies to experiment with this as much as I would like this summer.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Yes, Mark. Visually the effect is great. This is because a human eye has MUCH MUCH higher dynamic range in the brightness sensitivity. And it just compensite the brightness difference due to vignetting. Not so with a CCD detector or CMOS. We need to supress all the brightness range in to only 8 bit and then present it on a B/W monitor where we surely can see only 32 brightness gradations or 5 bit only! So, even slightest vignetting will be easily seenin such data presentation and only total or almost total absence of vignetting will be seen on the screen as no vignetting factor here.marktownley wrote:I got the same Valery, my images were vignetted. But, visually the results were very impressive offering a lot more contrast on the native quark. I just haven't had the clear skies to experiment with this as much as I would like this summer.
The vignetting in this pair of etalons is huge if to see it on a screen.
So, this mostly a visual mod, not good enough for imaging.
Valery.
Last edited by Valery on Mon Aug 10, 2015 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- Merlin66
- Librarian
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
- Location: Junortoun, Australia
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 619 times
- Contact:
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Why would you want to double stack a Quark which is already around 0.3A bandwidth??? (Because we can!??)
"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
- DSobserver
- Almost There...
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 2:36 pm
- Location: FRANCE
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Quark, 0.3A....Commercially for sure, but technically or visually I doubt!
Indeed if you compare a quark Vs a DS, the difference is big!
Indeed if you compare a quark Vs a DS, the difference is big!
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42524
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20783 times
- Been thanked: 10469 times
- Contact:
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
You're right, because we can; and even if someone says we can't we still try anywayMerlin66 wrote:Why would you want to double stack a Quark which is already around 0.3A bandwidth??? (Because we can!??)
Seriously though, a ss etalon, even one with a low bandpass 0.3a for example, still has continuum leakage in the wings - this is why we see the spicule ring around the edge of the sun. As soon as an etalon is double stacked the shape of the transmission changes, not just a narrower pass, but also how much less is transmitted off band - see the pic:
As a result the signal to noise ratio is higher and we get a higher contrast.
I'm sure Valery with enough sunshine time it could be developed to make it better for imaging, but, like i've mentioned before sun time has been at a real premium this year with barely enough time for normal imaging, let alone mod testing...
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 9:29 am
- Location: Dunfermline , Scotland
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Here's another response from Oliver ... re stacking a quark
Dear Brian,
You can reduce the filter bandpass/FWHM of your Quark with a Coronado PST etalon without both collimating lenses. Replace the second 200mm positive pcx lens with a dia. 1inch #29 or Schott RG630 dark red filter for reduce reflexions from eyepiece side. You need an adapter M35/M50 and M50/1.25" barrel.
He's a top bloke
Brian
Dear Brian,
You can reduce the filter bandpass/FWHM of your Quark with a Coronado PST etalon without both collimating lenses. Replace the second 200mm positive pcx lens with a dia. 1inch #29 or Schott RG630 dark red filter for reduce reflexions from eyepiece side. You need an adapter M35/M50 and M50/1.25" barrel.
He's a top bloke
Brian
" Gentlemen only ever use Refractors "
- Merlin66
- Librarian
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
- Location: Junortoun, Australia
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 619 times
- Contact:
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Mark,
Hmmm
I'm not convinced a DS 0.3A is any different from a Quark Lyot 0.3A filter......
Hmmm
I'm not convinced a DS 0.3A is any different from a Quark Lyot 0.3A filter......
"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
More than enough! I am looking for some clouds with a rain with a thunder!marktownley wrote:
I'm sure Valery with enough sunshine time
Tired under the sunshine.
Valery
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Heh! VERY different! I will always prefer double stacked 0,7A (resulting DS 0,5A) to a SS 0,25A Lyot !!! Always!Merlin66 wrote:Mark,
Hmmm
I'm not convinced a DS 0.3A is any different from a Quark Lyot 0.3A filter......
And I got both!
Valery
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 811 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Bandpass means nothing -- 0.7, 0.5, and 0.3 FWMH are all well within the absorption line:
Finesse -- or transmission profile -- means everything, and the "tail suppression" shown for the Coronado 0.7 vs. 0.5 DS (e.g. better finesse) is even more relevant when you consider the 0.5 curve is "normalized" to give the same peak transmission.
In reality, the peak transmission -- and more importantly transmission tails -- are about half the amplitude shown:
This leads to an even more dramatic suppression of continuum than one would assume from the normalized curves themselves.
Stacking etalons dramatically improves the finesse of a given etalon system, therefore filter system design (single verses multiple cavities) is more important than bandpass...
Finesse -- or transmission profile -- means everything, and the "tail suppression" shown for the Coronado 0.7 vs. 0.5 DS (e.g. better finesse) is even more relevant when you consider the 0.5 curve is "normalized" to give the same peak transmission.
In reality, the peak transmission -- and more importantly transmission tails -- are about half the amplitude shown:
This leads to an even more dramatic suppression of continuum than one would assume from the normalized curves themselves.
Stacking etalons dramatically improves the finesse of a given etalon system, therefore filter system design (single verses multiple cavities) is more important than bandpass...
Last edited by Bob Yoesle on Wed Aug 12, 2015 4:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
- Merlin66
- Librarian
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
- Location: Junortoun, Australia
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 619 times
- Contact:
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Bob,
I think the issue was - is the finesse of a DS etalon say giving 0.3A FWHM the same as a Quark Lyot filter with a 0.3A FWHM?????
I think the issue was - is the finesse of a DS etalon say giving 0.3A FWHM the same as a Quark Lyot filter with a 0.3A FWHM?????
"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 811 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Hi Ken,
Just about every DayStar image I've seen from their filters below 0.5 angstroms FWHM shows a leakage of continuum, whereas a properly tuned DS does not: http://www.cloudynights.com/topic/43800 ... try5656244
I conclude (and DayStar has stated) that their filters are single cavity filters -- therefore they don't appear to have the transmission profile (finesse) that results from a double stacked etalon system, even though they may have equal or narrower FWHM specs.
Just about every DayStar image I've seen from their filters below 0.5 angstroms FWHM shows a leakage of continuum, whereas a properly tuned DS does not: http://www.cloudynights.com/topic/43800 ... try5656244
I conclude (and DayStar has stated) that their filters are single cavity filters -- therefore they don't appear to have the transmission profile (finesse) that results from a double stacked etalon system, even though they may have equal or narrower FWHM specs.
Last edited by Bob Yoesle on Wed Aug 12, 2015 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
- Merlin66
- Librarian
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
- Location: Junortoun, Australia
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 619 times
- Contact:
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Bob,
I re-read your CN posting but still have problems with your 'double edge' = continuum leakage.
The spicule edge region is visible on band and off band....at 0.3 FWHM even with the "tails" you are still working within the wings of the Ha....
OK
My real issue is when you use a spectroheliograph (SHG) to generate a solar spectrum and then extract a strip from the absorption line the bandwidth of which will depend on the dispersion of the spectrograph and the PSF of the instrument. I'd like to think, that at least in theory, the extraction say of a 0.3A wide strip (based on a dispersion of >0.05 A/pixel and a measured resolution (using a neon reference line) of <0.1A) would NOT give the same "leakage" results of the etalons etc. but an almost "clean" 0.3A image with NO side band interference.
I have had images submitted for the new book on the digital SHG which don't show a double limb (but plenty of spicules!!).
Any comment?
I re-read your CN posting but still have problems with your 'double edge' = continuum leakage.
The spicule edge region is visible on band and off band....at 0.3 FWHM even with the "tails" you are still working within the wings of the Ha....
OK
My real issue is when you use a spectroheliograph (SHG) to generate a solar spectrum and then extract a strip from the absorption line the bandwidth of which will depend on the dispersion of the spectrograph and the PSF of the instrument. I'd like to think, that at least in theory, the extraction say of a 0.3A wide strip (based on a dispersion of >0.05 A/pixel and a measured resolution (using a neon reference line) of <0.1A) would NOT give the same "leakage" results of the etalons etc. but an almost "clean" 0.3A image with NO side band interference.
I have had images submitted for the new book on the digital SHG which don't show a double limb (but plenty of spicules!!).
Any comment?
"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 9:29 am
- Location: Dunfermline , Scotland
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Very interesting but a bit too technical for Brian's Brain
If I may .... chromo's at <0.5a do not have the wow visual factor of regular DS
that I recall.
If I may .... chromo's at <0.5a do not have the wow visual factor of regular DS
that I recall.
" Gentlemen only ever use Refractors "
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 811 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Hi Ken,
First, I have ZERO experience with SHG’s, so I can’t comment with an absolute conclusion on how they perform or what they actually show at the narrow bandpass you describe -- but I have a postulate based on both my own observation as well as reading and journal research. The vast majority of my experience is with a 0.7 FWHM ATM DayStar filter I purchased in 1976, followed by a ~ 0.5 FWHM Coronado SM90/90 DS system I purchased in 2003.
Over the years I have seen various references to features that often seemed to confuse or misidentify features near the limb, most significantly, the so-called “spicule fringe,” which in reality is the entire chromosphere - including spicules - highlighted by the edge of the photosphere which is visible in wider bandpass filters on-band due to continuum leakage from the filter transmission tails: 0.7 Å single stack image.
"Spicules" that are visible in the above image are a combination of macro spicules visible above what Harold Zirin (Astrophysics of the Sun) calls the “general chromosphere” – which includes prominences, etc. – and the true spicule layer which lies slightly below the general chromosphere and is more off-band due to Doppler shifting: Filtergrams from Zirin, H., Astrophysics of the Sun, Fig. 7.5 p. 161. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
My own experiment using my double stacked < 0.5 Å system shows an on-band image with the general chromosphere – including prominences and macro-spicules (top) with no photospheric leakage (no "double limb'), while when tuned to the blue wing the general chromopshere disappears, and the spicule layer becomes evident, with the limb of the photosphere becoming visible as we venture father off-band and out of the center of the absorption line (bottom):
Bob ;-)
First, I have ZERO experience with SHG’s, so I can’t comment with an absolute conclusion on how they perform or what they actually show at the narrow bandpass you describe -- but I have a postulate based on both my own observation as well as reading and journal research. The vast majority of my experience is with a 0.7 FWHM ATM DayStar filter I purchased in 1976, followed by a ~ 0.5 FWHM Coronado SM90/90 DS system I purchased in 2003.
Over the years I have seen various references to features that often seemed to confuse or misidentify features near the limb, most significantly, the so-called “spicule fringe,” which in reality is the entire chromosphere - including spicules - highlighted by the edge of the photosphere which is visible in wider bandpass filters on-band due to continuum leakage from the filter transmission tails: 0.7 Å single stack image.
"Spicules" that are visible in the above image are a combination of macro spicules visible above what Harold Zirin (Astrophysics of the Sun) calls the “general chromosphere” – which includes prominences, etc. – and the true spicule layer which lies slightly below the general chromosphere and is more off-band due to Doppler shifting: Filtergrams from Zirin, H., Astrophysics of the Sun, Fig. 7.5 p. 161. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Above we can see the filter being tuned from the one side of the H alpha line to the other (note how the photosphere becomes brighter as we move off-band). The true spicule layer - being largely Doppler-shifted to either side of the line - is much more prominent off-band, and much less visible when on-band, where the general chromosphere becomes visible and dominates the spicules which lie off-band. The photosphere is also continuously visible due to the leakage of continuum from the filter system tails. I believe this is how the misnomer of “spicule layer” for the general chromosphere originated from the lay solar observing community.... Beyond +/- ½ Å the narrow emission of the general chromosphere disappears, and only the broad-line spicules remain. (R. B. Dunn, SPO) (Emphasis added).
With a narrower band-pass and higher finesse filter system, it becomes more obvious where the true spicule layer lies, and the edge of the photosphere is eliminated when tuned on-band: Filtergrams from the Astrophysical Journal, 1996, Volume 471, The Pole-Equator Variation of Solar Chromospheric Height, Fig. 1.I re-read your CN posting but still have problems with your 'double edge' = continuum leakage.
The spicule edge region is visible on band and off band....at 0.3 FWHM even with the "tails" you are still working within the wings of the Ha....
(a) An off-band chromospheric image. Several arrows mark the locations of dark and bright spicules crossing the limb. The spicule is brighter than the sky, but normally is in absorption against the disk, even near the extreme limb. (b) A centerline image at the same position angle but a few hours later showing the inner limb due to sidebands of the Zeiss (Lyot) filter. (c) A limb image on a different date with a pure filter (Rakuljic filter), with the inner limb barely detectable from the morphology.
Thus it can be seen the effect of continuum leakage -- “the side bands of the Zeis (Lyot) filter” -- produces the perception of a “spicule layer,” via showing the “inner limb” -- the photosphere.The image through this pure filter [the Rakuljic (Rakuljic & Leyva 1993 ) holographic filter] does not show the spurious inner limb, which was shown by White and Simon (1966) to be due to continuum passing through the Lyot filter sidebands...
... Images in the wing of H-alpha show Doppler-shifted moving features in the chromosphere, namely spicules. Despite the evidence of the Dunn-Zirker images and various eclipse measurements, there is a general belief among solar physicists that the general chromosphere extends only to 2000 Km, as in the VAL model (Vernazza, Avrett & Loeser 1981). It is thought that the higher H-alpha emission is due to spicules. Our result establishes the qualitatively obvious fact that, except for macrospicules, the general chromosphere extends above the average spicules.
The off-band (spicule) limb is always lower than the centerline limb by an average value of 500 Km (0.7 arcsec). Because of the self reversal of the chromospheric H-alpha line, the off-band chromosphere is twice as bright as the centerline. As a result, the gradient of the off-band limb profile is considerably steeper just above the photosphere. Thus the popular view that spicules rise above the chromosphere is incorrect, except insofar as the macrospicules are concerned.
Johannesson, A. & Zirin, H. (1996) The Pole-Equator Variation of Solar Chromospheric Height. Astrophysical Journal, 1996, Volume 471, pp. 510-520 (Emphasis added).
My own experiment using my double stacked < 0.5 Å system shows an on-band image with the general chromosphere – including prominences and macro-spicules (top) with no photospheric leakage (no "double limb'), while when tuned to the blue wing the general chromopshere disappears, and the spicule layer becomes evident, with the limb of the photosphere becoming visible as we venture father off-band and out of the center of the absorption line (bottom):
I therefore believe this is a technical or semantic differentiation of terms between spicules themselves and macro spicules, which are a different beast altogether. Even at a very narrow 0.3 Å FWHM on-band with a SHG, I would expect to see macro-spicules, along with the general chromosphere, and no double-limb or ‘double-edge’ from the leakage of continuum. I would not expect to see the ‘real’ spicule layer, which should from the above discussion be less visible with a narrower FWHM and be buried below and within the general chromosphere when on-band.I have had images submitted for the new book on the digital SHG which don't show a double limb (but plenty of spicules!!).
Bob ;-)
Last edited by Bob Yoesle on Wed Aug 12, 2015 7:57 pm, edited 11 times in total.
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
- Geremia Forino
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 9:16 am
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Congratulations Bob that beautiful explanation, more clear than this could not be.
please, where is the button "I like"
please, where is the button "I like"
- Spectral Joe
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:34 am
- Location: Livermore, California
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
KenMerlin66 wrote:Bob,
I re-read your CN posting but still have problems with your 'double edge' = continuum leakage.
The spicule edge region is visible on band and off band....at 0.3 FWHM even with the "tails" you are still working within the wings of the Ha....
OK
My real issue is when you use a spectroheliograph (SHG) to generate a solar spectrum and then extract a strip from the absorption line the bandwidth of which will depend on the dispersion of the spectrograph and the PSF of the instrument. I'd like to think, that at least in theory, the extraction say of a 0.3A wide strip (based on a dispersion of >0.05 A/pixel and a measured resolution (using a neon reference line) of <0.1A) would NOT give the same "leakage" results of the etalons etc. but an almost "clean" 0.3A image with NO side band interference.
I have had images submitted for the new book on the digital SHG which don't show a double limb (but plenty of spicules!!).
Any comment?
Bob's explanation is quite complete, but one detail is missing. Ironically, the image that started the whole double limb controversy in 1963 came from a spectroheliograph, the one at the Mount Wilson 60 foot tower telescope. This instrument was considered to have extremely low stray light, but the test used to determine this was flawed in an important way. The Mount Wilson astronomers used a mercury arc and looked for Rowland ghosts and other features. The mercury arc was primarily a line emitter, and the level of stray light from the lines was too low to see. On the other hand, the solar continuum provided plenty of off band light, and what was considered a high quality grating in 1915 doesn't compare with what was available even a short time later. Thus, the scattered continuum light formed a ghost image on top of the Ha image. The double limb seen in etalon filters and Lyot filters have mixed sources (sidebands and wing effects) but the effect is the same. Modern gratings are much better than the early ones, and much cheaper. With a modern grating and care in keeping the post-slit optics clean a spectroheliograph today will provide the spectrally purest images available without going to a six figure investment.
Observing the Sun with complex optical systems since 1966, and still haven't burned, melted or damaged anything.
Not blind yet, either!
Light pollution? I only observe the Sun, magnitude -26.74. Pollute that!
Not blind yet, either!
Light pollution? I only observe the Sun, magnitude -26.74. Pollute that!
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Hi Joe,Spectral Joe wrote:Merlin66 wrote: With a modern grating and care in keeping the post-slit optics clean a spectroheliograph today will provide the spectrally purest images available without going to a six figure investment.
Thanks for your input. However I never have seen ANY sun pictures taken on a SHG which has same good resolution and contrast as
the pictures taken with Lyot and air-spaced filters.
Valery
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 811 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
It's a question of application. The SHG is more ideally suited for spectral line resolution, not optical resolution, where a filter is superior. I think this is what Joe is referring to.
I'm sure Joe will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe SHG resolution is a function of the slit width and the image scale at the slit itself. The result is that to get the resolution of a typical etalon filter of over 50 to 60 mm, the SHG would need and extremely narrow slit equivalent to the effective resolution of the filter, which would be very difficult to achieve (for amateur size applications at least).
But for spectral line purity at multiple wavelengths, the SHG is the way to go.
B-)
I'm sure Joe will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe SHG resolution is a function of the slit width and the image scale at the slit itself. The result is that to get the resolution of a typical etalon filter of over 50 to 60 mm, the SHG would need and extremely narrow slit equivalent to the effective resolution of the filter, which would be very difficult to achieve (for amateur size applications at least).
But for spectral line purity at multiple wavelengths, the SHG is the way to go.
B-)
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Hi Bob,Bob Yoesle wrote:It's a question of application. The SHG is more ideally suited for spectral line resolution, not optical resolution, where a filter is superior. I think this is what Joe is referring to.
I'm sure Joe will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe SHG resolution is a function of the slit width and the image scale at the slit itself. The result is that to get the resolution of a typical etalon filter of over 50 to 60 mm, the SHG would need and extremely narrow slit equivalent to the effective resolution of the filter, which would be very difficult to achieve (for amateur size applications at least).
But for spectral line purity at multiple wavelengths, the SHG is the way to go.
B-)
A SGH is not for spectral lines resolution. For this astronomers do use spectrographs. SGH is a device for imaging Sun disk or it's part in
a given wave length (normally at the same wave length as some given spectral lines). So, both Lyot (or air spaced) filter and SGH are
the sun imaging devices and their comparison is correct.
Valery
Last edited by Valery on Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 811 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Hi Valley,
I think this might be an apples and oranges thing, or I might be confused (as usual), as this is not an area I delve into with much frequency, and there is some overlapping terminology when the terms are (frequently) used interchangeably.
I thought there is a slight difference in meaning between a SHG - spectroheliograph - used to study the sun's line spectra (a solar spectrograph):
Image credit to Solar Chat member Wah.
Verses a SHS - spectrohelioscope - which adds an image synthesizer to the SHG in order to create an image for visual inspection or imaging as with traditional filters:
Regardless of this triva, you are of course correct in the fundamental issue of optical resolution, whether the instrument used is called a SHG or SHS, and images spectral lines or synthesizes images at a particular wavelength.
Again, I think Joe's point is that an SHG - or SHS - can have much greater spectral specificity or spectral resolution - as implied by the use of the term "purity" - when used for imaging. The optical resolution of a traditional FP etalon or filter is usually greater, but a different point altogether. These filters usually can get nowhere near what a high quality SHS or SHG can attain in terms of spectral resolution.
Boberino ;-)
I think this might be an apples and oranges thing, or I might be confused (as usual), as this is not an area I delve into with much frequency, and there is some overlapping terminology when the terms are (frequently) used interchangeably.
I thought there is a slight difference in meaning between a SHG - spectroheliograph - used to study the sun's line spectra (a solar spectrograph):
Image credit to Solar Chat member Wah.
Verses a SHS - spectrohelioscope - which adds an image synthesizer to the SHG in order to create an image for visual inspection or imaging as with traditional filters:
Regardless of this triva, you are of course correct in the fundamental issue of optical resolution, whether the instrument used is called a SHG or SHS, and images spectral lines or synthesizes images at a particular wavelength.
Again, I think Joe's point is that an SHG - or SHS - can have much greater spectral specificity or spectral resolution - as implied by the use of the term "purity" - when used for imaging. The optical resolution of a traditional FP etalon or filter is usually greater, but a different point altogether. These filters usually can get nowhere near what a high quality SHS or SHG can attain in terms of spectral resolution.
Boberino ;-)
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
- Merlin66
- Librarian
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
- Location: Junortoun, Australia
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 619 times
- Contact:
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Bob, Valery et al,
Having just finished 6 months detailed research on the SHS and the current digital SHG it may be more appropriate to start a new thread on the comparison of the digital SHG to the current commercial solar filters - give it it's own thread.
Having just finished 6 months detailed research on the SHS and the current digital SHG it may be more appropriate to start a new thread on the comparison of the digital SHG to the current commercial solar filters - give it it's own thread.
"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 811 times
Re: Beloptik to stack a Quark
Excellent Ken (here's a link): http://solarchat.natca.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=17275
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory