PST or Lunt components?

Frankenscope? Let's see it!***be advised that NOTHING in this forum has been safety tested and you are reading and using these posts at your own peril. blah, blah, blah... dont mess around with your eyesight when it comes to solar astronomy. Use appropriate filtration at all times...
Post Reply
The Sun?
The Sun?
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:05 am

PST or Lunt components?

Post by Bassoon » Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:27 am

I am converting a 100mm ED refractor for solar use. Hope someone can advise.

Would a Coronado PST or a Lunt 50 pressure scope be preferable at the business end? (Lunt 100mm ERF over objective).

The Lunt has the B600 filter - is this wider than the PST filter?

Is use of a focal reducer viable to change the focal ratio to suit the Lunt better?

Any advice welcome, thanks.

User avatar
Posts: 26747
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
Location: Brierley Hills, UK

Re: PST or Lunt components?

Post by marktownley » Fri Oct 28, 2016 5:58 pm

PST is easier mechanically. Depends how competent you are with such things...
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!

Post Reply