The Charlie Bates Solar Astronomy Project is proudly sponsored by the following fine companies:

Transit of Mercury in the Spicule Layer. Phil took this great image with his Quantum 6 Scope, Solar Spectrum etalon and PGR Camera.
Welcome to Solar Chat! The best forum for Solar Astronomy
Moving forward from solar cycle 24 to 25
A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17951
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Hi CaK freaks
just arrived home and took a pair of 395 nm chinese filters out of my mail box. I have mounted them already and we expect sunshine on wendsday :woohoo:
Looking at a light bulb they show a nice violett, but I guess they are much to broad. We will see, hopefully soon.
just arrived home and took a pair of 395 nm chinese filters out of my mail box. I have mounted them already and we expect sunshine on wendsday :woohoo:
Looking at a light bulb they show a nice violett, but I guess they are much to broad. We will see, hopefully soon.
Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE 
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17951
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Hi all
another hope is gone
the chineese 395/30 filters are too broad, also in the case of a stack
the plot overview
the plot close up
the real result on the sun
another hope is gone

the plot overview
the plot close up
the real result on the sun
Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE 
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 26434
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge

Thanks for trying Walter...

http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17951
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Hi Mark
don't be disappointed. The search goes on. The show must go on ;-)
don't be disappointed. The search goes on. The show must go on ;-)
Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE 
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
I read the thread with a greet interest. Thanks to all who have participated.swisswalter wrote: The search goes on. The show must go on ;-)
But the question what is the end of story?
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17951
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Hi Valery
now, the show goes on, we just look out for the acteurs ;-)
now, the show goes on, we just look out for the acteurs ;-)
Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE 
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 26434
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
We need someone who can manufacture these CaK filters economically to the 2.2a bandpass - Aries? 


http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
No, not at this moment and nearest future.marktownley wrote:We need someone who can manufacture these CaK filters economically to the 2.2a bandpass - Aries?

But what with Andor 390 + 393( ? ) filters combo? As I saw the pictures, they are nearly as good as with Lunt wedge and brighter.
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17951
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Hi Valery
thank you very much. Yes you are right, the combo 390+393 is much brighter than the Lunt piece but not narrow enough
thank you very much. Yes you are right, the combo 390+393 is much brighter than the Lunt piece but not narrow enough
Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE 
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Colin has the best idea I seen for a while. Perhaps a mica inserted in between the 10nm filters will tell if it is a small etalon. Colin Will calcite work as good as mica? How much is a suitable piece of mica? Can we find a source?
Look Up!
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Look Up!
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17951
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Hi Joe
yes, Mica is indeed cheap. $$$'s are not the problem. Cleaving one single thin error free sheet out of it is one of the challanges.
yes, Mica is indeed cheap. $$$'s are not the problem. Cleaving one single thin error free sheet out of it is one of the challanges.

Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE 
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 26434
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
I personally don't think just inserting a piece of mica between 2 filters like this will work at all - too many variables: Firstly we don't know if stacking 2 filters like this is effective, secondly we don't know the exact gap needed between the 2 filters if it did work, and it would have to be an precise gap. Thirdly, like Walter says there is no effective way for us to effectively cleave one single error free sheet at the right thickness (which we don't know).
By all means try it Joe, but Walter did some considerable trialing with the mica and trying to make spacers to repair a Lunt 50 etalon, with no proper success, and this is with Walter having access to facilities in a professional chemistry lab...
By all means try it Joe, but Walter did some considerable trialing with the mica and trying to make spacers to repair a Lunt 50 etalon, with no proper success, and this is with Walter having access to facilities in a professional chemistry lab...

http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Mark - Just to be devils advocate, I am going to disagree as Colin has pointed us this direction and mark Wagner has mentioned it in the past. I PMd Mark W over at the CN thread to come over and give us some input on the idea. Perhaps on mica thickness, filter stack configuration, quality of cleave and expectations on cut. I hope he engages us. He seems to be the man with the most experience on the mica issue.
Mark W are you there?
Mark W are you there?
Look Up!
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 26434
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Devils advocate is good! 


http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge


Look Up!
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17951
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Hi Joe
I like that thread and "devils advocat" is a great term. They use to be very, very insistent, which is not very easy to scope with all the time.
Joe are you thinking of spacing two filters with a mica sheet or are you thinking of attaching two reflecting filters with a mica piece (daystar type)
I'm happy to send you some MICA from Africa if the interest is great, at no cost
an example
I like that thread and "devils advocat" is a great term. They use to be very, very insistent, which is not very easy to scope with all the time.

Joe are you thinking of spacing two filters with a mica sheet or are you thinking of attaching two reflecting filters with a mica piece (daystar type)

I'm happy to send you some MICA from Africa if the interest is great, at no cost

an example
Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE 
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Hallo Walter, sorry for not getting back sooner - been a busy day. The question you ask is a good one. I am interested to see what Mark Wagner says. I have thought about both methods but not yet decided. You mentioned "attaching", attaching perhaps the way Lunt seems to have done? Yes. something similar. I have yet to go back and look at some of the information Mark W gave us earlier about how he constructed some of his etalons and filter stacks.
I remember in one thread we were engaged with Catlin on constructing the double pass filter that required a binding of two prisms with an optical contact agent that had a nome like Canada balm or something termed similar to this. Can you remember the name? I was wondering if that is what we are seeing on your micro side view of the Lunt. I am Wondering if that is a method? Or is mica spaced or optically contacted some other way?
Can two reflecting cavity type filters be bound either side of mica and achieve the band cut based on bifrigence alone or will there have to be BG or other type of glass spacing? Will there have to be a gap? or will the natural bifringence do the job if simply contacted or pressed to the mica mechanically?.
Or will there have to be reflective a cavity filter, a spacer, mica and then some type of blocker like a 390 series , 410 or other behind the mica? I reallly have to go back and read Marks previous posts. When my hard drive crashed i lost the links to those posts and the favorites I had saved in the old form did not follow me here. Thus I must dig through the old posts to find some of Marks Ws stack configurations. Do you have the links to those posts saved? If so can you relink me? Regardless, as I remember it we still did no speak specifically to optically binding mica, only polished crystal or glass etalons. So as you can see I have many questions on how exactly to approach the stack.
Best Regards,
Devils Advocate
I remember in one thread we were engaged with Catlin on constructing the double pass filter that required a binding of two prisms with an optical contact agent that had a nome like Canada balm or something termed similar to this. Can you remember the name? I was wondering if that is what we are seeing on your micro side view of the Lunt. I am Wondering if that is a method? Or is mica spaced or optically contacted some other way?
Can two reflecting cavity type filters be bound either side of mica and achieve the band cut based on bifrigence alone or will there have to be BG or other type of glass spacing? Will there have to be a gap? or will the natural bifringence do the job if simply contacted or pressed to the mica mechanically?.
Or will there have to be reflective a cavity filter, a spacer, mica and then some type of blocker like a 390 series , 410 or other behind the mica? I reallly have to go back and read Marks previous posts. When my hard drive crashed i lost the links to those posts and the favorites I had saved in the old form did not follow me here. Thus I must dig through the old posts to find some of Marks Ws stack configurations. Do you have the links to those posts saved? If so can you relink me? Regardless, as I remember it we still did no speak specifically to optically binding mica, only polished crystal or glass etalons. So as you can see I have many questions on how exactly to approach the stack.
Best Regards,
Devils Advocate

Last edited by sullij1 on Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
Look Up!
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Also, thank you for your wonderful offer to share your mica stash but I already have several packages being shipped as we write. 

Look Up!
- Peter Williams
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:06 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Canada Balsam is used as a cement when mounting microscope slides and cover glasses.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_balsam
Also has good optical properties and used to cement lens elements together. Sounds like what you are referring to.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_balsam
Also has good optical properties and used to cement lens elements together. Sounds like what you are referring to.
Beginner amateur astronomer, keen on solar astronomy.
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Ah Ha, I found the old conversation but it only brings up more questions. i wonder if Mark W will share some new speculations after seeing the microscope view of the lunt magic back filter?
Here are the important parts of his previous post regarding etalon and stacking designs. But this makes me want to ask :
What was used as the "ITF" in this design?
What was the whole title of the "10 angstrom blocker" filter? that is "way" tight (narrow)! Where did they come from (source)? Did he mean 10nm CaK line type?
Or what was the bandpass on the 10 angstrom if the FWHM was 10angstrom?
Was this stack optically bonded as etalons are by letting the vacuum naturally form?
How is this accomplished with mica?
He stated "UV Polaroid when "thickness of the mica was not a ½ wave plate". What does this mean thickness is 1/2 wave plate mean? I thought wave value was measured on the flat surface not the thickness.
How is it measured?
MOSTLY - Not so much interested in the etalon design I think the "Paragraph 6 design" is very close to where we want to be.
FROM HIS PREVIOUS POST:
6) The difference in design of the two. The Daystar has two different K-line housing. The standard tiltable K-line is nothing more than two 10Ang blockers and an ITF. So it went AR, 10ang, BG25, ITF, 10ang, BG25, AR. Del would call this a 5ang filter but it was really not. But it does work, the plage was there and you could see prominence sometimes.
The etalon based filter was the other design. At K-line it takes much more temperature to move the bandpass. So unlike Ha the temperature control is less critical. The other advantage is the bandpass are broader so tilting can be use easier. I did put some etalon filters in the tiltable housing but added a strip heater and temperature controller to have more control of the bandpass.
Ok, the design for the etalon based filter would be AR, 10ang,(sometime BG25 and UV Polaroid )etalon, ITF, BG25,AR. You would need to use the UV Polaroid when the thickness of the mica was not a ½ wave plate or the next peak was not outside the blocker. This is because the mica is birefringent and will have two peaks. One for the different indexes on the different axis.
It should be noted that the UV Polaroid material we used is no longer made. So the ones I make need to be ½ wave plates to keep the HW as narrow as possible.
HEEELP!
Here are the important parts of his previous post regarding etalon and stacking designs. But this makes me want to ask :
What was used as the "ITF" in this design?
What was the whole title of the "10 angstrom blocker" filter? that is "way" tight (narrow)! Where did they come from (source)? Did he mean 10nm CaK line type?
Or what was the bandpass on the 10 angstrom if the FWHM was 10angstrom?
Was this stack optically bonded as etalons are by letting the vacuum naturally form?
How is this accomplished with mica?
He stated "UV Polaroid when "thickness of the mica was not a ½ wave plate". What does this mean thickness is 1/2 wave plate mean? I thought wave value was measured on the flat surface not the thickness.
How is it measured?
MOSTLY - Not so much interested in the etalon design I think the "Paragraph 6 design" is very close to where we want to be.
FROM HIS PREVIOUS POST:
6) The difference in design of the two. The Daystar has two different K-line housing. The standard tiltable K-line is nothing more than two 10Ang blockers and an ITF. So it went AR, 10ang, BG25, ITF, 10ang, BG25, AR. Del would call this a 5ang filter but it was really not. But it does work, the plage was there and you could see prominence sometimes.
The etalon based filter was the other design. At K-line it takes much more temperature to move the bandpass. So unlike Ha the temperature control is less critical. The other advantage is the bandpass are broader so tilting can be use easier. I did put some etalon filters in the tiltable housing but added a strip heater and temperature controller to have more control of the bandpass.
Ok, the design for the etalon based filter would be AR, 10ang,(sometime BG25 and UV Polaroid )etalon, ITF, BG25,AR. You would need to use the UV Polaroid when the thickness of the mica was not a ½ wave plate or the next peak was not outside the blocker. This is because the mica is birefringent and will have two peaks. One for the different indexes on the different axis.
It should be noted that the UV Polaroid material we used is no longer made. So the ones I make need to be ½ wave plates to keep the HW as narrow as possible.
HEEELP!
Look Up!
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
And one last question: If we are introducing a bifringment (mica) are we back to a tilting mechanism to hit - widen and narrow the passband?
Nite Nite!
Nite Nite!

Look Up!
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17951
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Hi Joe
thank you very much for all the questions, I'm not in a position to answer them. But maybe we can discuss one thing after the other.
As I understood the 1/2 wafe plate means if you want to make a solid CaK filter stack the mica has to have a thickness of ~200 nm. In the case of a Ha solid etalon ~330 nm. I'm sure the mica is optically bound to the glass plates and there is no glue what so ever. The edges of the stack might be coated in order die protect the coatings of the glass plates from humidity and corrosion of the silver coating. personally I do not see me in a position to handle a 200 nm thin plate, you know how thin that is, just a fifth of a micron
thank you very much for all the questions, I'm not in a position to answer them. But maybe we can discuss one thing after the other.
As I understood the 1/2 wafe plate means if you want to make a solid CaK filter stack the mica has to have a thickness of ~200 nm. In the case of a Ha solid etalon ~330 nm. I'm sure the mica is optically bound to the glass plates and there is no glue what so ever. The edges of the stack might be coated in order die protect the coatings of the glass plates from humidity and corrosion of the silver coating. personally I do not see me in a position to handle a 200 nm thin plate, you know how thin that is, just a fifth of a micron

Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE 
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa

Re: A surprise in the LUNT CaK wedge
Interesting Walter. Now I really want to see Mark Ws input on that.
Look Up!