I just wish I had an imaging filter that would image a wavelength these would show up. They don’t seem to show up in 430, 540 and 656nm.

Thanks Mark. Full disk low rez but they show what spots are present.

Aaron,
Does any of these anomalies line up with disturbances seen in Ha near active regions?

James

Aaron,
Sure. Feel free to PM them to me. The more I have to go on the more I may be able to help you in your quest.

James.

WoW. Your images show the filaments VERY well.

Nice!

Very nice CaK. Always enjoyed and welcomed.

James

Stephane,

Both of those scopes make a great pair. And as I have said before, a beautiful observing site!

Nice work!!

James

Very nice imaging, Pavel!!

Wonderful imaging from such a small scope!

It obvious that your seeing was very good. These are beautifully detailed. Very nice work Pedro. And your great three-light mosaic is back!

Thanks for posting your great work.

James

I see the Coronado 60. It’s dwarfed by the Meade 16” SCT.

Thanks and you are welcome, Dennis and Pedro.

This morning before leaving out to see my Dad I did a quick 540 and 430nm imaging session using my Orion70 with the Point Grey camera and Mac Laptop running ASTRO IIDC. Processing was done in PS CC 2020. The seeing was below average and the temperature was 71F ( 21.6C ). The time taken is in the ima...

WoW, Turi. Very nice!!

Very nice Richard. I love the labeling!

Averton wrote: ↑Sat Jun 03, 2023 11:26 am Glad you're feeling better James.
Great set of images!!

Thanks Clare & Peter. I am feeling " normal " today.

marktownley wrote: ↑Sat Jun 03, 2023 6:02 am These are excellent images James! You have the tuning on that Ha scope perfectly even there. You should 'clock' the position of the etalon relative with a sharpie, then you can return to it quickly. I have done this with my sm90.

Thanks Mark. Not a bad idea!

ffellah wrote: ↑Sat Jun 03, 2023 11:00 am These are all great, James. Ha is very even, very well done

Franco

That's the damndest hardest thing for me to do!

WoW, that would be hard to get accustomed to.

I'm tempted to try a pair of 10x42 eclipse smarts from celestron and compare against the lunts._MarkTownley

They should show a bit more detail than the Lunt 8x32 pair but will certainly require a tripod for close-study views.

Excellent resolution on the spots and granules in the photosphere images. That 152mm refractor does very well.

James

marktownley wrote: ↑Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:09 am How are you feeling today James? Any better?

Yeah. A lot better. I was still a little off this morning but by work time I was back to normal. I did get an imaging session in today.

This looks current! You are using older equipment. What nostalgia!

James

marktownley wrote: ↑Sat Jun 03, 2023 4:55 am Thanks guys. Cloudy here this morning, i'm going to move to some open fields soon and hopefully get a nice sunny day.

Good luck, Mark.

Thanks Warren and Turi.

Me too, on seeing the Sun!!

James