Lunt LS50THa + ZWO ASI120MM (Solar Newbie Experience)
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:22 am
As promised elsewhere, a few witterings on my *personal*
experience of "commissioning" a basic Solar Setup based on
the Lunt LS50THa plus ZWO ASI 120MM (mono) camera.
N.B. I'm not a Visual Astronomer, I'm a VIDEO Astronomer. I
do have experience with "imaging" but not in "classical" sense?
Normally, I control my scopes remotely, and use Watec Video
Cameras - Directly to screen or with added (Registax) stacking.
I had a quick visual look through the Lunt... and everything
looked just FINE! But my eyesight / patience is a bit limited?
To be honest, the first IMAGE left me a tad frustrated... Why
wasn't I getting the *consummate* Full-Sun disks (as here)?
A thousand quid/bucks... And it "didn't quite work"? <sweat>
Then I did a bit of Google Searching (Even found Solarchat)!
My first problem: The image didn't look "half bad"... But over
only HALF the image? Inspired by the experience of others, I
then rotated the diagonal "randomly" 90 deg about the axis.
Suddenly the image was a lot better... At least more "even"?
I replaced the finger screw by an M4 Bolt and tightened it on
the diagonal nose-piece. (Take care not to strip the thread!)
Later, in more considered experiments I showed the effect
of "clocking" the diagonal through the four compass points:
[Sadly I cannot upload images at the moment] ?
I then settled on one of the four (the best) orientation and
was then left with a *reasonable* Solar Image... But the
new "evenness" served to emphasise the Newton's Rings?
[Sadly I cannot upload images at the moment] ?
BUT, following the KNOWN idea, I then tried the experiment
of *stopping* the scope tracking during the exposure. And...
it worked. There was a slight loss of contrast, but no Rings!
[Sadly I cannot upload images at the moment] ?
So THAT is basically "where I'm at" at the moment.
I am relaxed about the setup! The rest is down to me...
Re. Stuff such as "exposure times"? I am using the rather
excellent "FireCapture" Software! As with Video Astronomy,
I just twiddle the sliders to get the "best" result? I stack
the images via Registax 5.1 and I post-process via GIMP...
My Software settings are ever rather arbitrary? lol. But folk
do publish such things on the internet! <nudge> <nudge>
For what it's worth, I PLAN to look at the ImPPG program...
Again, I am no expert, but if this helps anyone.
experience of "commissioning" a basic Solar Setup based on
the Lunt LS50THa plus ZWO ASI 120MM (mono) camera.
N.B. I'm not a Visual Astronomer, I'm a VIDEO Astronomer. I
do have experience with "imaging" but not in "classical" sense?
Normally, I control my scopes remotely, and use Watec Video
Cameras - Directly to screen or with added (Registax) stacking.
I had a quick visual look through the Lunt... and everything
looked just FINE! But my eyesight / patience is a bit limited?
To be honest, the first IMAGE left me a tad frustrated... Why
wasn't I getting the *consummate* Full-Sun disks (as here)?
A thousand quid/bucks... And it "didn't quite work"? <sweat>
Then I did a bit of Google Searching (Even found Solarchat)!
My first problem: The image didn't look "half bad"... But over
only HALF the image? Inspired by the experience of others, I
then rotated the diagonal "randomly" 90 deg about the axis.
Suddenly the image was a lot better... At least more "even"?
I replaced the finger screw by an M4 Bolt and tightened it on
the diagonal nose-piece. (Take care not to strip the thread!)
Later, in more considered experiments I showed the effect
of "clocking" the diagonal through the four compass points:
[Sadly I cannot upload images at the moment] ?
I then settled on one of the four (the best) orientation and
was then left with a *reasonable* Solar Image... But the
new "evenness" served to emphasise the Newton's Rings?
[Sadly I cannot upload images at the moment] ?
BUT, following the KNOWN idea, I then tried the experiment
of *stopping* the scope tracking during the exposure. And...
it worked. There was a slight loss of contrast, but no Rings!
[Sadly I cannot upload images at the moment] ?
So THAT is basically "where I'm at" at the moment.
I am relaxed about the setup! The rest is down to me...
Re. Stuff such as "exposure times"? I am using the rather
excellent "FireCapture" Software! As with Video Astronomy,
I just twiddle the sliders to get the "best" result? I stack
the images via Registax 5.1 and I post-process via GIMP...
My Software settings are ever rather arbitrary? lol. But folk
do publish such things on the internet! <nudge> <nudge>
For what it's worth, I PLAN to look at the ImPPG program...
Again, I am no expert, but if this helps anyone.