Re: Mg II in UltraViolet
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:16 pm
Hello Bob,
Here are the simulations for a re-spaced classic C8 :
http://astrosurf.com/viladrich/astro/in ... -Plate.htm
The diffraction limited flat-field increases by a factor of four when the Schmidt plate position is set 230mm ahead its nominal position.
There is no impact on the spherochromatism (= still very bad in near UV).
As for the correction in near UV light, there are several issues :
- the spherical aberration changes rapidely with wavelength below 420 mm. This is why the Strelh ratio drops drastically below 420 mm ;
- in order to design a spherical aberration corrector, we would need to know with good accuracy what is the actual shape of the Schmidt plate ;
- this is why ASH actually measured the Schmidt plate of a C8 to design a Barlow lens for this specific C8.
My guess is that a 200 mm F/8 Newtonian telescope is much more appropriated to high resolution Ca K imaging.
I hope to run some tests in Ha on my 300 mm Newtonian with a sub-aperture ERF. If things go well, the next step will be to make a small aperture Ca K ERF filter.
I still have the option open for a ERM coating on my 300 mm scope. The idea would be to have a coating reflecting red (for Ha) and near UV light (for Ca K).
Here are the simulations for a re-spaced classic C8 :
http://astrosurf.com/viladrich/astro/in ... -Plate.htm
The diffraction limited flat-field increases by a factor of four when the Schmidt plate position is set 230mm ahead its nominal position.
There is no impact on the spherochromatism (= still very bad in near UV).
As for the correction in near UV light, there are several issues :
- the spherical aberration changes rapidely with wavelength below 420 mm. This is why the Strelh ratio drops drastically below 420 mm ;
- in order to design a spherical aberration corrector, we would need to know with good accuracy what is the actual shape of the Schmidt plate ;
- this is why ASH actually measured the Schmidt plate of a C8 to design a Barlow lens for this specific C8.
My guess is that a 200 mm F/8 Newtonian telescope is much more appropriated to high resolution Ca K imaging.
I hope to run some tests in Ha on my 300 mm Newtonian with a sub-aperture ERF. If things go well, the next step will be to make a small aperture Ca K ERF filter.
I still have the option open for a ERM coating on my 300 mm scope. The idea would be to have a coating reflecting red (for Ha) and near UV light (for Ca K).