08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Hi Everyone.
Here is an animated spectral sweep through the Ca K line from data taken during my 08Aug imaging session. The wavelength offsets (in milliAngstroms) are marked in the upper left hand corner of each frame. The frame rate is rather slow this time. I used one second per frame (36 frames) for this animation. The entire sweep covers about 1.7 Angstroms. (You can see why a Lunt CaK filter bandpass of 2.2A will fail to reveal filaments!)
Cheers, Peter.
Here is an animated spectral sweep through the Ca K line from data taken during my 08Aug imaging session. The wavelength offsets (in milliAngstroms) are marked in the upper left hand corner of each frame. The frame rate is rather slow this time. I used one second per frame (36 frames) for this animation. The entire sweep covers about 1.7 Angstroms. (You can see why a Lunt CaK filter bandpass of 2.2A will fail to reveal filaments!)
Cheers, Peter.
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Hi Peter,
very instructing and useful for judging if a CaK-filter is on band or not, thanks for posting!
Frank
very instructing and useful for judging if a CaK-filter is on band or not, thanks for posting!
Frank
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34730
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 18048 times
- Been thanked: 8914 times
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Stunning, however the Lunt is 2.4A so it is even worse than you state, the old PST was 2.2A. I wish there was a filter which was tighter. I think Mark's double stack CaK PST filter is the best I have seen.
This is great for reference material
Alexandra
This is great for reference material
Alexandra
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42614
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20908 times
- Been thanked: 10562 times
- Contact:
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
That's a stunner Peter! I wish my CaK were that good!
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Merlin66
- Librarian
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
- Location: Junortoun, Australia
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 619 times
- Contact:
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Peter,
Well done mate!
What bandwidth were you using??
Well done mate!
What bandwidth were you using??
"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
- Carbon60
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 14335
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: Lancashire, UK
- Has thanked: 8587 times
- Been thanked: 8321 times
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Fabulous sequence, Peter. Very enlightening!
Stu.
Stu.
H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Thanks for all your comments, Everyone.
Ken: I haven't bench tested this lately but can get a rough estimation from my H alpha results of this August. If I compare the fwhm of a measured spectral line in my instrument with a spectral linewidth of the same line in the BASS2000 spectrum, I get an instrumental bandpass of ~ 0.18 Angstrom (fwhm) near H alpha for my spectrometer in the present configuration (25 micron slit, 500mmf collimator, 2400 l/mm grating, 300mmf camera lens).
Here is a comparison plot of a measured spectrum taken on August 8 and the BASS2000 spectrum.
In this magnified view, I'm comparing the widths of a relatively isolated feature. The BASS2000 spectrum claims a resolution of 0.01 Angstrom and I'm assuming the relation: BASS2000_fwhm^2 + Instrumental_fwhm^2 = Measured_fwhm^2 , which is strict for Gaussian profiles. From the fwhm values quoted on the last plot, the Instrumental_fwhm can be calculated to be ~0.18 Angstroms. This seems to be pretty reasonable when you observe how the images change over the course of the spectral sweep.
It's much more difficult to do this type of comparison in the uv because of the congested nature of the spectrum. Here's an example.
Cheers, Peter.
Ken: I haven't bench tested this lately but can get a rough estimation from my H alpha results of this August. If I compare the fwhm of a measured spectral line in my instrument with a spectral linewidth of the same line in the BASS2000 spectrum, I get an instrumental bandpass of ~ 0.18 Angstrom (fwhm) near H alpha for my spectrometer in the present configuration (25 micron slit, 500mmf collimator, 2400 l/mm grating, 300mmf camera lens).
Here is a comparison plot of a measured spectrum taken on August 8 and the BASS2000 spectrum.
In this magnified view, I'm comparing the widths of a relatively isolated feature. The BASS2000 spectrum claims a resolution of 0.01 Angstrom and I'm assuming the relation: BASS2000_fwhm^2 + Instrumental_fwhm^2 = Measured_fwhm^2 , which is strict for Gaussian profiles. From the fwhm values quoted on the last plot, the Instrumental_fwhm can be calculated to be ~0.18 Angstroms. This seems to be pretty reasonable when you observe how the images change over the course of the spectral sweep.
It's much more difficult to do this type of comparison in the uv because of the congested nature of the spectrum. Here's an example.
Cheers, Peter.
- Merlin66
- Librarian
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
- Location: Junortoun, Australia
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 619 times
- Contact:
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Peter,
As you appreciate it's always difficult to estimate the resolution from spectra comparison. A spectral reference lamp is the preferred method.
Notwithstanding, I think you're pretty close in your estimates....
I ran your spectroheliograph through the SimSpec_SHG for comparison......
As you appreciate it's always difficult to estimate the resolution from spectra comparison. A spectral reference lamp is the preferred method.
Notwithstanding, I think you're pretty close in your estimates....
I ran your spectroheliograph through the SimSpec_SHG for comparison......
"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Hi Peter,p_zetner wrote: ↑Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:38 pm Hi Everyone.
Here is an animated spectral sweep through the Ca K line from data taken during my 08Aug imaging session. The wavelength offsets (in milliAngstroms) are marked in the upper left hand corner of each frame. The frame rate is rather slow this time. I used one second per frame (36 frames) for this animation. The entire sweep covers about 1.7 Angstroms. (You can see why a Lunt CaK filter bandpass of 2.2A will fail to reveal filaments!)
Cheers, Peter.
092854 new spectral series flat-div siz labels siz.gif
Missed this topic, unfortunately. Reading it now. Thanks a lot for such a nice animation - very illustrative!
OK about the band pass which allows to image filaments. What must be the FWHM to see them with confidence?
Valery
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Ken: Thanks for running the calculation. It seems to be in the ball park, although, I guess, it is a best estimate of resolution as, for example, optical aberrations aren't considered. It's pure laziness that I haven't made a bench test of the resolution recently. I'll do this in the near future.
Valery: To roughly answer your question, I can average together some number of frames around line centre to model the action of a filter of given fwhm bandpass. Ideally, this would be a weighted average to simulate, say, a Gaussian bandpass. I'll work on this. Straightforward averaging of frames is easy in ImageJ and, I suppose, would give a rough answer to your question but I have to figure out how to accomplish the weighted averaging for a more refined answer.
Peter
Valery: To roughly answer your question, I can average together some number of frames around line centre to model the action of a filter of given fwhm bandpass. Ideally, this would be a weighted average to simulate, say, a Gaussian bandpass. I'll work on this. Straightforward averaging of frames is easy in ImageJ and, I suppose, would give a rough answer to your question but I have to figure out how to accomplish the weighted averaging for a more refined answer.
Peter
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:46 pm
- Location: France
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2725 times
- Contact:
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Hi Peter,
This is great !!
Could you display the individual frames in a single large image, just like you did for Ha ?
This is great !!
Could you display the individual frames in a single large image, just like you did for Ha ?
Christian Viladrich
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:46 pm
- Location: France
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2725 times
- Contact:
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
It looks like that the filaments are best visible in the range of plus / minus 0.080 A.
This means that a filter should have a FWHM < 0.16 A to show any filaments.
This means that a filter should have a FWHM < 0.16 A to show any filaments.
Christian Viladrich
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 2:33 pm
- Has thanked: 57 times
- Been thanked: 1205 times
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: 08Aug: Spectral sweep through the Ca K line
Thanks, John.
As you can imagine, these animations require a lot of work (40 spectroheliograms in this case) but I enjoy the end result.
Cheers.
Peter
As you can imagine, these animations require a lot of work (40 spectroheliograms in this case) but I enjoy the end result.
Cheers.
Peter