Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Frankenscope? Let's see it!***be advised that NOTHING in this forum has been safety tested and you are reading and using these posts at your own peril. blah, blah, blah... dont mess around with your eyesight when it comes to solar astronomy. Use appropriate filtration at all times...
Post Reply
stefanr
The Sun?
The Sun?
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:27 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by stefanr »

I was inspired by this blog post (link) and after reading a lot about Lunt mods here on SolarChat and on other astronomy forums I decided to try it out on my 130mm f/7 refractor.

I have a Lunt Solar Telescope LS50THa with B600 blocking filter so I bought the adapters listed in the link above and screwed a 2" UV/IR cut filter into the nosepiece (this acts as an internal ERF before the etalon). I am planning to buy a full aperture ERF when I know what telescope I am going to use as a Lunt 50 mod scope going forward (just to be safe).

My telescope is a TS-Optics Photoline 130 mm f/7 FPL53 Triplet APO Refractor.
One good thing about this scope is that I can remove a 90mm tube extender to get a total of 213mm working distance.
With the extender removed I had 51mm on the telescope focuser distance and put in the Lunt etalon with UV/IR cut filter and B600 blocking filter into the focuser. A small adjustment on the helical focuser and I got a crisp and clear view of the sun in my TeleVue 25mm eyepiece. I saw a lot of h-alpha detail in the chromosphere and eveything seems to work fine.

Here is a photo of the setup:
hele setuppet.jpg
hele setuppet.jpg (151.12 KiB) Viewed 741 times

And here is a photo of the Lunt 50 etalon with adapters, UV/IR cut filter and B600 blocking filter:
Lunt50 delen.jpg
Lunt50 delen.jpg (131.22 KiB) Viewed 741 times

I tried to put on my ZWO ASI 174MM camera and as expected I experienced vignetting, but I guess that does not matter if I am imaging small features like prominences and sunspots. And I can always put the Lunt etalon back into the small Lunt 50 telescope if I want to image the full disc.

Actually, I think that using my 130mm triplet is a bit too much for this purpose so I am planning to buy a 102mm f/11 ED telescope to use as solar telescope but I am not sure that an f/11 scope will be usable with this Lunt 50 mod? The telescope am planning to buy has a working distance of 270 mm with the tube extender removed.

How do I calculate the perfect distance needed between the lens of a telescope and the beginning of the Lunt etalon?
Any other suggestions and advices are welcome.


User avatar
marktownley
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 32317
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
Location: Brierley Hills, UK
Has thanked: 5960 times
Been thanked: 2777 times
Contact:

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by marktownley »

Nice mod and welcome to the forum!

The Lunt 50 uses a 20mm clear aperture etalon, and the native Lunt scope is f7. So, the front collimating lens in the etalon assembly will need to be 140mm ahead / inside the focal point of the f7 donor scope. Using a scope with a different focal ratio will just affect the size of the sweetspot.


Image
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
User avatar
GreatAttractor
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 772
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: Germany
Has thanked: 335 times
Been thanked: 198 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by GreatAttractor »

stefanr wrote: Fri Aug 06, 2021 9:42 pm Actually, I think that using my 130mm triplet is a bit too much for this purpose so I am planning to buy a 102mm f/11 ED telescope to use as solar telescope but I am not sure that an f/11 scope will be usable with this Lunt 50 mod?
It will work (see this reply), though closer to f/7 would give a larger (in terms of angular size) sweet spot.

stefanr wrote: Fri Aug 06, 2021 9:42 pm How do I calculate the perfect distance needed between the lens of a telescope and the beginning of the Lunt etalon?
Any other suggestions and advices are welcome.
You can measure it precisely with a camera; see the first post in this thread.


My software:
Stackistry — an open-source cross-platform image stacker
ImPPG — stack post-processing and animation alignment
My images

SW Mak-Cass 127, ATM Hα scopes (90 mm, 200 mm), Lunt LS50THa, ATM SSM, ATM Newt 300/1500 mm, PGR Chameleon 3 mono (ICX445)
User avatar
MalVeauX
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1650
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:58 pm
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 671 times
Been thanked: 664 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by MalVeauX »

Looks good!

Can you share more about the adapters used to make it possible to insert into 2" standard gear?

I'm doing similar with a Lunt 60 modular version that already is made to insert into an OTA. Just trying to work out an adapter for it.

Very best,


stefanr
The Sun?
The Sun?
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:27 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by stefanr »

MalVeauX wrote: Sat Aug 07, 2021 3:36 pm Looks good!

Can you share more about the adapters used to make it possible to insert into 2" standard gear?

I'm doing similar with a Lunt 60 modular version that already is made to insert into an OTA. Just trying to work out an adapter for it.

Very best,
The adapters used for my Lunt 50 mod are these:
TS-Optics Adapter with M68 male thread and M48x0.75 female thread
TS-Optics M68 System - Conversion Adapter with continuous M68x1 female Thread
Baader M68 extension tube, length 20 mm

And the last part is just a normal 2" nosepiece extender

Here you can see how the parts are put together:
adapter.JPG
adapter.JPG (191.78 KiB) Viewed 705 times


stefanr
The Sun?
The Sun?
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:27 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by stefanr »

GreatAttractor wrote: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:05 am
stefanr wrote: Fri Aug 06, 2021 9:42 pm How do I calculate the perfect distance needed between the lens of a telescope and the beginning of the Lunt etalon?
Any other suggestions and advices are welcome.
You can measure it precisely with a camera; see the first post in this thread.
Thank you. Using the method descibed in the post I found that 53mm is the perfect distance on the TS-Optics Photoline 130mm refractor.

However, some people think that I am mad to use just a 2" UV/IR cut filter in front of the Lunt 50 etalon.
The argument is that the full visible spectrum still builds up a lot of heat that might damage the etalon.

The same people suggests that it will be safer to use a 2" Baader 3.5nm H-alpha pass filter as an ERF in front of the etalon.
Before I go out and spend a lot of money on this filter I just want to check if any of you have any comments regarding this?

I am planning to measure the temperature of the light coming out of the etalon next time I get a chance, but I cannot measure the temperature inside the telescope since I do not have a full aperture ERF on it.


User avatar
MalVeauX
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1650
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:58 pm
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 671 times
Been thanked: 664 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by MalVeauX »

Thanks, appreciate seeing that! Definitely different on that one than the new modular ones.

Here's what I'm trying to sort with the new Lunt 60mm Modular series; attaches with thumbolts. Nothing threaded:
Lunt60MT_06.jpg
Lunt60MT_06.jpg (60.67 KiB) Viewed 660 times
Lunt60MT_04.jpg
Lunt60MT_04.jpg (40.51 KiB) Viewed 660 times
Lunt60MT_01.jpg
Lunt60MT_01.jpg (63.4 KiB) Viewed 660 times
Very best,


User avatar
VasilevIvan
Ohhhhhh My!
Ohhhhhh My!
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 7:46 pm
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by VasilevIvan »

Nice decision Stefan! Have a nice solar captures!

MalVeauX would you be so kind to send photo of your telescope with Lunt60Mt?

Best wishes, Ivan.


Vasilev Ivan

Meade SolarMax II 60mm DS
Sky-Watcher SW MAK 150
Sky-Watcher SW 80 ED
TS-Optics 6'' /f5,9
Meade LightBridge 12''
AZ-EQ6 Pro, HEQ-5 mount
DayStar Quark Chromosphere
Lunt CaK B1800
D-ERF Baader 6''
ASI 174mm monochrome camera
ASI 183mm monochrome camera

"I want to believe!"
torsinadoc
Im an EXPERT!
Im an EXPERT!
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:53 pm
Has thanked: 450 times
Been thanked: 150 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by torsinadoc »

Marty did you sort an adapter?


AndiesHandyHandies
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 6:46 am
Location: Derbyshire UK
Has thanked: 1198 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by AndiesHandyHandies »

Hi

People use the 35nm Baader as an internal ERF. Not 3.5nm.

I found a problem with reflections off one and a PST etalon following it. Just use a UV-IR as a ERF now. It reflections are invisible for visual.

A Beloptik KG3 after the Etalon to stop long IR, which the 35nm filter passes.

Cheers. Andrew.


User avatar
Rusted
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 11:00 am
Has thanked: 2892 times
Been thanked: 971 times
Contact:

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by Rusted »

AndiesHandyHandies wrote: Tue Aug 24, 2021 7:45 am Hi

People use the 35nm Baader as an internal ERF. Not 3.5nm.

I found a problem with reflections off one and a PST etalon following it.
Just use a UV-IR as a ERF now. It reflections are invisible for visual.

A Beloptik KG3 after the Etalon to stop long IR, which the 35nm filter passes.

Cheers. Andrew.
After the etalon? Is there some particular reason for this placing?
I have my Baader 35nm stacked with the KG3 just behind it.
Placed well up the main tube on several 2" extensions.
I also have a full aperture D-ERF for my 150/10.
The idea being to spread the [still hot] light cone across the full filter area.
To avoid localised heating causing internal thermal issues.


http://fullerscopes.blogspot.dk/

Baader 160mm D-ERF, iStar 150/10 H-alpha objective, 2" Baader 35nm H-a, 2" Beloptik KG3, PST etalon, Lunt B1200S2, Assorted T-S GPCs, ZWO ASI174.
AndiesHandyHandies
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 6:46 am
Location: Derbyshire UK
Has thanked: 1198 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by AndiesHandyHandies »

Hi Rusted,

The PST was after the Baader 35nm.

People complain about the bright reflection off the front of the PST etalon and I assume that was coming back off the Baader 35nm.

For my RuMak180 a 1.25" UV-IR inside the baffle brings it down to about a 6" in terms of heat load. Peter Drew has used a 6" PST Mod 2 without any ERF for years.

Cheers. Andrew.


User avatar
Rusted
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 11:00 am
Has thanked: 2892 times
Been thanked: 971 times
Contact:

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by Rusted »

Thanks Andrew.

I used a 6" with an internal Baader D-ERF and still cooked my ZWO camera!

Reflections are only really noticeable when pushing the gain hard for prom exposure.
Perhaps the reflections are there all the time but go unnoticed?

Somebody should invent a wedged 2" filter ring [or adapter] with built-in tilt.
It has to maintain the optical axis on the outer screw threads. A simple enough task for a Chinese CNC machinist.

Not the usual tilter plate. Which is total overkill for any support task short of a Pro DSLR.


http://fullerscopes.blogspot.dk/

Baader 160mm D-ERF, iStar 150/10 H-alpha objective, 2" Baader 35nm H-a, 2" Beloptik KG3, PST etalon, Lunt B1200S2, Assorted T-S GPCs, ZWO ASI174.
AndiesHandyHandies
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 6:46 am
Location: Derbyshire UK
Has thanked: 1198 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by AndiesHandyHandies »

Hi Rusted,

I am doing visual only on the RuMak.

Cheers. Andrew.


User avatar
krakatoa1883
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 9:41 am
Location: Mediolanum
Has thanked: 154 times
Been thanked: 491 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by krakatoa1883 »

The adapters I described in my blog are not actually necessary if one uses a front D-ERF because in this case the barrel of the red glass (arrowed below) can be removed and the M68 thread on the red block can be directly used even if the focuser has a 2" drawtube only.
Adapter.jpg
Adapter.jpg (65.52 KiB) Viewed 418 times
On most refractors with a M68 thread at the end of the focuser drawtube, this allows to place the collimating lens at the right distance inside the primary focus.


Raf
My solar images and reports with articles on solar equipment
User avatar
MalVeauX
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Way More Fun to Share It!!
Posts: 1650
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:58 pm
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 671 times
Been thanked: 664 times

Re: Lunt 50 mod with f/7 and f/11 refractors

Post by MalVeauX »

torsinadoc wrote: Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:51 am Marty did you sort an adapter?
VasilevIvan wrote: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:14 pm MalVeauX would you be so kind to send photo of your telescope with Lunt60Mt?
Here's what I ended up doing. 3D printed rear cell that replaces the focuser flange on the C6R. It has a lip with thumb bolts so that the Lunt module just inserts and the thumb bolts secure it, just like on the stock scope just scaled up. A basic 2" filter can be used as a sub aperture DERF and botch-threads to the module without any modfication. No modification to the Lunt module at all. Just the one 3D printed adapter and that was it.

C6R_Baffle_Removal.jpg
C6R_Baffle_Removal.jpg (35.71 KiB) Viewed 171 times
Lunt_60_Adapter_01.jpg
Lunt_60_Adapter_01.jpg (47.78 KiB) Viewed 171 times
Lunt_60_Adapter_02.jpg
Lunt_60_Adapter_02.jpg (46.44 KiB) Viewed 171 times
Lunt_60_Adapter_03.jpg
Lunt_60_Adapter_03.jpg (38.48 KiB) Viewed 171 times
Lunt_60_Adapter_04.jpg
Lunt_60_Adapter_04.jpg (67.19 KiB) Viewed 171 times
Lunt_60_Adapter_05.jpg
Lunt_60_Adapter_05.jpg (56.92 KiB) Viewed 171 times
Lunt_60_C6R_Adapter_01.jpg
Lunt_60_C6R_Adapter_01.jpg (42.06 KiB) Viewed 171 times
Lunt_60_Baader_50m_DERF.jpg
Lunt_60_Baader_50m_DERF.jpg (29.48 KiB) Viewed 171 times
C6R_Lunt60_Mod_FirstLight_Test_01.jpg
C6R_Lunt60_Mod_FirstLight_Test_01.jpg (63.39 KiB) Viewed 171 times
C6R_Lunt60_Mod_FirstLight_Test_ERF_03.jpg
C6R_Lunt60_Mod_FirstLight_Test_ERF_03.jpg (113.15 KiB) Viewed 171 times

I'm still tweaking things, as I'm sure it's not optimally placed at all, but its not vignetting at this time. Things I'm doing wrong: it's operating at F10 in this configuration with F7 collimators (reduces my sweet spot); it's not at exactly -140mm back focus, but it's near that area. It came to focus and is on band roughly, but the contrast is low. I see HA features but its probably near the 0.8A range and low contrast in this poor configuration. I will tighten things up with more testing and perhaps with a different donor scope eventually. I'm currently awaiting a new 3D printed cell for my front DERF so I can use it at the full 6 inch aperture and will test further, at F8, which is much better match with the collimator.


Here it is at least working, just not optimal yet:
C6R_Lunt60Mod_FC_FlatField_UniformityTest.jpg
C6R_Lunt60Mod_FC_FlatField_UniformityTest.jpg (84.78 KiB) Viewed 170 times
120mmF10_HA_Lunt60Mod_IMX290_FullField_01.jpg
120mmF10_HA_Lunt60Mod_IMX290_FullField_01.jpg (176.37 KiB) Viewed 170 times
120mmF10_HA_Lunt60Mod_IMX290_LImbTest_02.jpg
120mmF10_HA_Lunt60Mod_IMX290_LImbTest_02.jpg (93.56 KiB) Viewed 167 times

+++++++++++++++++++++

I have it too far into the light cone. So that probably is why I'm not getting the results I want, at least, so far.

This OTA (C6R) was shortened by the previous owner for Bino use. So its already short. I took off the focuser flange. And here is a crude measurement using projection of the sun onto the black cap (see the sun in focus, clouds, etc there) showing the plane of focus and that I should put the Lunt collimator lens -140mm from that point, 7 inches towards the scope. That's at about 17 inch mark on my tape measure I'm holding there. So my current setup, the Lunt module is way too far into the light cone, I need to pull it back. But my scope is short already so I need to extend things. This means I'll probably put the focuser back on to get that distance back and explore a 2" insertion mod so that my Lunt can be at the correct -140mm and on a rigid focuser rather than extensions.

20210817_192123.jpg
20210817_192123.jpg (3.93 MiB) Viewed 167 times

So, back to the drawing board!


I would MUCH rather get this sorted to use standard focusers with 2" and use a 2" insert to make this work, instead of the plate adapter, to ensure everything is orthogonal to the light cone. And to keep it ultra simple. The Lunt 50 is better suited to this. The Lunt 60 will require some custom stuff since nothing is threaded, its all insert & thumb bolt on modular series. So will need more work to get it modded like this. That said, I'd suggest the Lunt 50 for the simplicity as shown in this thread above with ready off the shelf adapter rings and 2" gear insertion. Dead simple! The Lunt 60 for me was about getting a full disc scope and having the little 70mm F6 ED frac it comes with as a base for other things too and the crayford; can't stand helical.

Even better than these would be a Lunt 80mm DS II unit, with adapters to mount. Costs more, but its a big etalon for a bigger sweet spot on bigger aperture longer scope options. Requires custom work of course.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Edit:

Noting the above, the etalon is totally in the wrong location in the optical pathway (mine that is). It's way too forward. I'm pulling it back. Oversight on my part because it was "working" and so I left it and it clouded up and I never got back to it.

I also confirmed that the threading on the Lunt 60 modular is M50x1 as my PST gold tube threads directly to it nicely. So I've ordered some M50x1 adapters to convert to M48x0.75 so I can go 2" extension and still thread a sub-aperture DERF on if wanted and will update when I get the parts and have it positioned correctly.

Very best,


Post Reply