Another comparison of CaK SHG and PST -- looking for filaments

I LOVE finding out about different ways to appreciate the Sun and light in general. Use this forum to post your info or questions about various outside the mainstream ways to appreciate our life giving star!
Post Reply
thesmiths
Almost There...
Almost There...
Posts: 1053
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:13 pm
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 1485 times

Another comparison of CaK SHG and PST -- looking for filaments

Post by thesmiths »

The super large filaments on the Sun's surface now, very visible in H-alpha, have led Ken to notice how much better the very narrow bandwidth of the spectroheliograph (SHG) is to see these features in Calcium K. See viewtopic.php?f=4&t=34008 and viewtopic.php?f=4&t=34024. We had actually deliberately lowered the spectral resolution of our 300mm Canon lens SHG in order to see if the wider bandwidth better matched the normal Calcium filter images. But we got distracted by the search for filaments, after seeing Ken's results.

The grating in this case was 1800 l/mm (intermediate between the 1200 l/mm and 2400 l/mm gratings that we also have tried) and the slit width was 20 microns (vs 10 and 30 micron that we have also experimented with). The SHG image was taken using an ASI 290MM, with a #47 violet filter in front to block out stray light. The collimator lens was 100mm and the camera lens was 135mm.

CaK SHG with 1800 l/mm grating -- filaments visible
CaK SHG with 1800 l/mm grating -- filaments visible
130203_shift=0_clahe.jpg (135.05 KiB) Viewed 659 times

The optics in this setup did not seem ideal for focusing at 400nm and the experimental conditions were not ideal (imaging through the bedroom window, Sun very low in the sky). I believe there are some signs of the filaments in the bottom portion but the contrast is not as high as with Ken's setup, which uses a 2400 l/mm grating and a narrower slit, so has a significantly narrower bandwidth.

I just managed a quick CaK PST image before the Sun dipped below the trees:

CaK PST -- filaments not visible
CaK PST -- filaments not visible
CaK-PST-221121.jpg (329.74 KiB) Viewed 659 times

This image, taken with exactly the same camera (including the #47 violet filter), is of quite reasonable quality, all things considered, but there are no signs of the filaments in the bottom portion of the image.

While the big filaments last, I will attempt a narrower bandwidth experiment using better optics.


User avatar
marktownley
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 42130
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
Location: Brierley Hills, UK
Has thanked: 20240 times
Been thanked: 10111 times
Contact:

Re: Another comparison of CaK SHG and PST -- looking for filaments

Post by marktownley »

Good comparison Douglas!


Image
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
User avatar
Merlin66
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 3970
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Junortoun, Australia
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 615 times
Contact:

Re: Another comparison of CaK SHG and PST -- looking for filaments

Post by Merlin66 »

Doug,
Very good presentation. The comparison helps understand to issue/ problem with CaK filaments.
I've tried to summarise what I've found:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=34040


"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy  
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
User avatar
Montana
Librarian
Librarian
Posts: 34526
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
Location: Cheshire, UK
Has thanked: 17521 times
Been thanked: 8763 times

Re: Another comparison of CaK SHG and PST -- looking for filaments

Post by Montana »

I can definitely see the filament in your SHG image :bow

I love the SHG images which are coming out at the moment :hamster:

Alexandra


Post Reply