One version of our "wide-field" SHG used a Canon 300mm f4 L IS lens as the "telescope". This didn't achieve as good results as I had hoped, despite it being a very high quality camera lens. Given that it has autofocus and image stabilisation built in, I hypothesised that perhaps it just had too many lens elements (I think there are 15) and that this might create some problems.
So instead, I went in the other direction and tried out a very cheap 300mm f5.6 generic vintage lens. This lens apparently has only 4 elements so in some way is more like a simple telescope. My initial experiments show that this simple cheap lens does seem to work a bit better than the expensive modern Canon lens. The cheap vintage lens is also considerably lighter (560 vs 1190 gm) and has a very nice built-in helical focuser, as well as a very convenient tripod adapter.
The "telescope" is a 300mm f5.6 Prinz Galaxy, the collimator is a 100mm f4 Palinar (also a simple, cheap lens with a very nice helical focuser), and the camera lens is a Rodagon 135mm f5.6 enlarging lens mounted on a BPM bellows to enable focusing. The diffraction grating is a 50mm x 50mm 1800 l/mm ruled grating from Thorlabs and the slit is 20 micron wide and 3mm long, also from Thorlabs.
The camera in this case was an ASI 290MM. A Hoya NDX4 neutral density filter was mounted in front of the 300mm lens. The image was taken at 4ms and gain of 22, with a scan speed of 25x (in DEC). This is a relatively low-resolution set-up but there is clear evidence of the filament in the southern hemisphere. This filament is only weakly visible in H-alpha and normally not visible at all in Calcium.
A new SHG using a cheap 300mm f5.6 lens
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:13 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 1485 times
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34527
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17526 times
- Been thanked: 8763 times
Re: A new SHG using a cheap 300mm f5.6 lens
I was just going to say that I can clearly see the filament that Ken imaged in his post. Lovely work!!
Alexandra
Alexandra