CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Location: Ajman, U.A.E.
- Has thanked: 580 times
- Been thanked: 389 times
CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
Hi,
As long i am going with my equipment collecting and getting ready seriously for the winter coming here and getting more into solar imaging i am just deciding to not wait until next year to add things, i got a budget 2 days ago and i ordered a second scope for DSO and that cleared my plan now for going back to solar imaging gear, and the main thing i am thinking about to add now is to have a real Ha-CaK-line filter or tool so that i can have that result later, and i came up with almost two options of makers after all, and i can't decide which one.
1. Lunt CaK module, with this i have two path, first is which blocking filter to go with [from 600 up to 1800] and which design, Straight-Thru or Diagonal.
2. Daystar Calcium H-Line Quark, i think there is only one model of this.
Both above sounds to give nice results, i am more leaning towards Lunt one, either 600 or 1200 really, but i want to ask to make sure what to choose from experts over here, so what do you recommend?!!!
I will use any kind oe size of scopes, maybe from 40mm up to 150mm if i buy that scope.
Thanks
As long i am going with my equipment collecting and getting ready seriously for the winter coming here and getting more into solar imaging i am just deciding to not wait until next year to add things, i got a budget 2 days ago and i ordered a second scope for DSO and that cleared my plan now for going back to solar imaging gear, and the main thing i am thinking about to add now is to have a real Ha-CaK-line filter or tool so that i can have that result later, and i came up with almost two options of makers after all, and i can't decide which one.
1. Lunt CaK module, with this i have two path, first is which blocking filter to go with [from 600 up to 1800] and which design, Straight-Thru or Diagonal.
2. Daystar Calcium H-Line Quark, i think there is only one model of this.
Both above sounds to give nice results, i am more leaning towards Lunt one, either 600 or 1200 really, but i want to ask to make sure what to choose from experts over here, so what do you recommend?!!!
I will use any kind oe size of scopes, maybe from 40mm up to 150mm if i buy that scope.
Thanks
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 536 times
- Been thanked: 806 times
Re: CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
Lunt or Solar Spectrum would be my choices.
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Location: Ajman, U.A.E.
- Has thanked: 580 times
- Been thanked: 389 times
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 536 times
- Been thanked: 806 times
Re: CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
The size is related to your focal length. The longer the FL, the larger the filter you should get. The module numerical value roughly translates to the max FL you can get a fill-disc un-vignetted image.
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42120
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20229 times
- Been thanked: 10111 times
- Contact:
Re: CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
Get the biggest Lunt you can afford Tareq!
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Merlin66
- Librarian
- Posts: 3970
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
- Location: Junortoun, Australia
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 615 times
- Contact:
Re: CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
A viable alternative that not only gives CaK imaging but all other solar wavelengths is to use a Mini Spectroheliograph.
Much, much cheaper than the commercial filters and much more capable.
Check out the Sol'Ex website for details.
http://www.astrosurf.com/solex/sol-ex-p ... on-en.html
Much, much cheaper than the commercial filters and much more capable.
Check out the Sol'Ex website for details.
http://www.astrosurf.com/solex/sol-ex-p ... on-en.html
"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Location: Ajman, U.A.E.
- Has thanked: 580 times
- Been thanked: 389 times
Re: CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
I know that, but i won't use only the biggest FL, also from what i read it is mentioning like a fixed aperture but variant FL, strange, so if i buy something like 150mm aperture then i stopped it down to 120 or 100mm with something like 1000-1200mm focal length and then using a telecentric Barlow, what should buy?Bob Yoesle wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 2:41 pm The size is related to your focal length. The longer the FL, the larger the filter you should get. The module numerical value roughly translates to the max FL you can get a fill-disc un-vignetted image.
Also i am asking about which module, the straight thru one or the diagonal one??!!
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Location: Ajman, U.A.E.
- Has thanked: 580 times
- Been thanked: 389 times
Re: CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
I don't know which one i can afford, if next month or after next month then the least one, if in November with the new budget maybe up to 1200 version only, if i didn't buy a scope and only buy the module then i can go to 1800 version, tough decision.
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42120
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20229 times
- Been thanked: 10111 times
- Contact:
Re: CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
I thought you had quite a few scopes already? Just buy the biggest module.
I'd buy straight through.
I'd buy straight through.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Location: Ajman, U.A.E.
- Has thanked: 580 times
- Been thanked: 389 times
Re: CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
Thank you very muchMerlin66 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 12:21 am A viable alternative that not only gives CaK imaging but all other solar wavelengths is to use a Mini Spectroheliograph.
Much, much cheaper than the commercial filters and much more capable.
Check out the Sol'Ex website for details.
http://www.astrosurf.com/solex/sol-ex-p ... on-en.html
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Location: Ajman, U.A.E.
- Has thanked: 580 times
- Been thanked: 389 times
Re: CaK, Lunt or Daystar?
Well, to clarify that, my scopes are for DSO and planetary, mostly are reflectors and added many refractors as well but all at small or medium sizes, it means i can go with the least one then, but if i buy a large refractor then this is a bit different requirement, so to me it is like i should choose between smallest scopes or largest scope.marktownley wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 10:32 am I thought you had quite a few scopes already? Just buy the biggest module.
I am also thinking about the straight thru one, i feel the diagonal one is more for visual which i don't think i will do visual with CaK anyway.