Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
- Petrus
- Almost There...
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:14 pm
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 1496 times
- Been thanked: 684 times
- Contact:
Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
I would like to ask more seasoned imagers about their thoughts and experience about choosing full aperture D-ERF for TS Optics 152mm f/5.9 scope or sub-aperture D-ERF installed at another side of the focuser (inside the tube) similar to the option Tecnosky offers as a product (Quark Chromosphere, Tecnosky 152mm with pre-installed 75mm D-ERF).
I would choose between Baader 160mm (full aperture) or 75mm D-ERF (sub-aperture).
I have so far experienced using 115mm aperture with Quark Chromosphere, which gave me bit of skeptical thoughts about will my local seeing be too often good enough for using an even bigger aperture. I don't have permanent setup, so everything must be taken out and it every time for imaging.
All thoughts are welcome!
Photo from Tecnosky website:
I would choose between Baader 160mm (full aperture) or 75mm D-ERF (sub-aperture).
I have so far experienced using 115mm aperture with Quark Chromosphere, which gave me bit of skeptical thoughts about will my local seeing be too often good enough for using an even bigger aperture. I don't have permanent setup, so everything must be taken out and it every time for imaging.
All thoughts are welcome!
Photo from Tecnosky website:
~ Petrus ~
Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/people/194757663@N08/
LS80THa DSII - Calcium II K module 12mm - Lunt Herschel wedge 1.25" - Quark Chromosphere - Solarscout Quark - Sol'Ex
Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/people/194757663@N08/
LS80THa DSII - Calcium II K module 12mm - Lunt Herschel wedge 1.25" - Quark Chromosphere - Solarscout Quark - Sol'Ex
- MalVeauX
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:58 pm
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 1171 times
- Been thanked: 1360 times
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
Hi,
If you plan on using the whole 150mm aperture, go full aperture. Especially with short focal length. The disc image is tiny with that focal length and so all the energy of the 150mm is concentrated into a smaller area, it will be very hot in that tiny area, so a sub-aperture D-ERF is less effective there. It would be easier if the focal length was much longer so that the full disc image was a larger area and so the concentrated heat was covering that larger area (less heat per area), allowing a smaller D-ERF to function better. So if using F6, I would absolutely suggest full aperture instead. Look into Altair Astro's full aperture, you can get dual or triband perhaps. They're excellent optically too (flat).
Very best,
If you plan on using the whole 150mm aperture, go full aperture. Especially with short focal length. The disc image is tiny with that focal length and so all the energy of the 150mm is concentrated into a smaller area, it will be very hot in that tiny area, so a sub-aperture D-ERF is less effective there. It would be easier if the focal length was much longer so that the full disc image was a larger area and so the concentrated heat was covering that larger area (less heat per area), allowing a smaller D-ERF to function better. So if using F6, I would absolutely suggest full aperture instead. Look into Altair Astro's full aperture, you can get dual or triband perhaps. They're excellent optically too (flat).
Very best,
- Petrus
- Almost There...
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:14 pm
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 1496 times
- Been thanked: 684 times
- Contact:
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
Thank you for your detailed answer Marty!
~ Petrus ~
Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/people/194757663@N08/
LS80THa DSII - Calcium II K module 12mm - Lunt Herschel wedge 1.25" - Quark Chromosphere - Solarscout Quark - Sol'Ex
Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/people/194757663@N08/
LS80THa DSII - Calcium II K module 12mm - Lunt Herschel wedge 1.25" - Quark Chromosphere - Solarscout Quark - Sol'Ex
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42269
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20424 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
- Contact:
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
I have gone with a 160mm full aperture Baader with my recently purchased 152/5.9 frac.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Petrus
- Almost There...
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:14 pm
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 1496 times
- Been thanked: 684 times
- Contact:
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
Nice to hear you are getting experience with this setup too! I decided to go with full aperture D-ERF too when it becomes possible.
~ Petrus ~
Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/people/194757663@N08/
LS80THa DSII - Calcium II K module 12mm - Lunt Herschel wedge 1.25" - Quark Chromosphere - Solarscout Quark - Sol'Ex
Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/people/194757663@N08/
LS80THa DSII - Calcium II K module 12mm - Lunt Herschel wedge 1.25" - Quark Chromosphere - Solarscout Quark - Sol'Ex
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:57 pm
- Location: EU (PL)
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
I used Baader CCD-R as a sub ERF with my TS 152/900 and it worked fine, but I always kept in mind that was only 2" filter placed on concentrated light beam, especially on tracking mount. Now i use full aperture Baader D-erf so no worries about safety, heating etc.
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2022 5:20 am
- Has thanked: 4206 times
- Been thanked: 3807 times
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
The inner DERF needs to be positioned so that the diameter of the sun disk is close to the diameter of the filter, i.e. close enough to the objective and tilt it slightly. If the internal DERF is close to the eyepiece, the solar disk is in a small area with a large heat intensity. I know several people who have been running an internal ERF Lunt 2" in a suitable location for several years without the slightest problem.
But I am not one of them.
But I am not one of them.
I do not look at the sky with the eyes of an astronomer, but of a person looking for the beauty of nature.
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42269
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20424 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
- Contact:
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
Any etalon that uses a soft coated (blocking) filter in a large aperture, fast focal ratio system with a sub aperture ERF will suffer premature failure. Fact.
I'm talking about the soft coated filters fsiling here.
I'm talking about the soft coated filters fsiling here.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2022 5:20 am
- Has thanked: 4206 times
- Been thanked: 3807 times
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
How early is too early? The manufacturer of the filter does not specify the lifetime, so it is difficult to define what is premature.marktownley wrote: ↑Wed Mar 29, 2023 7:08 pm Any etalon that uses a soft coated (blocking) filter in a large aperture, fast focal ratio system with a sub aperture ERF will suffer premature failure. Fact.
I'm talking about the soft coated filters fsiling here.
The older LUNT ERF 50mm has been working in the AR150/F8 for at least 4 years. It is regularly visually inspected and shows no signs of damage. As a second protection, a 2" UV/IR cut is placed in front of the telecentric element.
I thought about it myself, but ended up buying the Baader DERF 160 and 180mm. However, I also have a 35nm H-a filter in the set, which has proven very useful for me by increasing the contrast of the image. It obviously filters out any ambient reflections well.
I do not look at the sky with the eyes of an astronomer, but of a person looking for the beauty of nature.
- MalVeauX
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:58 pm
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 1171 times
- Been thanked: 1360 times
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
Hi,
Realistically all that is needed for virtually any aperture that is portable is an optically flat film or optically flat glass that is IR reflective and then use an internal sub-aperture selective filter (such as a red or h-alpha centered imaging class 2" filter). The bulk of the thermal issues are handled with just the IR removal itself. UV barely is even part of this, not even worth worrying about. The rest of visible spectrum carries significant thermal energy, but it's manageable with just removing IR really and the selective sub-aperture filter will help with the remainder of visible spectrum.
I imagine a large plate of optically flat glass or film with IR blocking coatings is cheaper to produce/buy than a full on D-ERF with H-alpha and/or other bands coated for. It would greatly simplify the DERF question and work for all frequencies under IR.
Very best,
Realistically all that is needed for virtually any aperture that is portable is an optically flat film or optically flat glass that is IR reflective and then use an internal sub-aperture selective filter (such as a red or h-alpha centered imaging class 2" filter). The bulk of the thermal issues are handled with just the IR removal itself. UV barely is even part of this, not even worth worrying about. The rest of visible spectrum carries significant thermal energy, but it's manageable with just removing IR really and the selective sub-aperture filter will help with the remainder of visible spectrum.
I imagine a large plate of optically flat glass or film with IR blocking coatings is cheaper to produce/buy than a full on D-ERF with H-alpha and/or other bands coated for. It would greatly simplify the DERF question and work for all frequencies under IR.
Very best,
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:44 pm
- Location: Germany
- Has thanked: 2977 times
- Been thanked: 2082 times
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
Red glass full aperture ERFs (Daystar / Lunt) are simple but cost the same as a full aperture d-erf because the figuring of the glass.
The "bulk" energy is not only in ir but also in the visible spectrum.
With internal secondary filtration you just bring a good part of energy into the scope again, not much gained.
Spending so much money for a h-alpha equipment and then saving on internal seeing improving equipment is kind of like using a takahashi apo with a standard china diagonal / barlow.
There is no cheap solution when it comes to this unless somebody invents D-ERF film.
The "bulk" energy is not only in ir but also in the visible spectrum.
With internal secondary filtration you just bring a good part of energy into the scope again, not much gained.
Spending so much money for a h-alpha equipment and then saving on internal seeing improving equipment is kind of like using a takahashi apo with a standard china diagonal / barlow.
There is no cheap solution when it comes to this unless somebody invents D-ERF film.
- Attachments
-
- 1.PNG (74.99 KiB) Viewed 2144 times
Triband C9.25
H-a: Quark Chromosphere with BF mod
WL: Antlia 500nm/ 3nm, 393 nm/ 3nm
Ca-K: homebrew (includes 2x 1.5A filters, thanks Apollo)
Player One Apollo Max + Mars MII
Barlows:
-2x Gerd Düring 2.7x
-2x TMB 1.8x
H-a: Quark Chromosphere with BF mod
WL: Antlia 500nm/ 3nm, 393 nm/ 3nm
Ca-K: homebrew (includes 2x 1.5A filters, thanks Apollo)
Player One Apollo Max + Mars MII
Barlows:
-2x Gerd Düring 2.7x
-2x TMB 1.8x
- OlegLviv
- Almost There...
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 4:24 am
- Location: Ukraine/Lviv
- Has thanked: 881 times
- Been thanked: 907 times
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
I bought TS 150/5.9 a few mounth ago and am happy and bought full aperture Baader Erf 160mm and the parasitic rays and various bad reflections disappeared!
- Attachments
-
- Без імені.jpg (101.46 KiB) Viewed 2017 times
https://www.facebook.com/oleg.lavigne/
https://www.astrobin.com/users/RamonLviv/
https://www.astroclub.kiev.ua/forum/ind ... ic=46758.0
Telescope: TS 152/900/Bresser 102/1350
Baader D-ERF 160MM
2xBaader 1.25 GPC
2xLunt 50mm
Lunt Cak B1200
Coronado BF15
Camera: Apollo Max 432M/ Apollo Mini 429M/Player One Mars II 462M/QHY 290MM
Mounh: 2xSky Watcher AZEQ6
Telecentric Lense: Televue Powermate 2/2.5x/4X/5X
https://www.astrobin.com/users/RamonLviv/
https://www.astroclub.kiev.ua/forum/ind ... ic=46758.0
Telescope: TS 152/900/Bresser 102/1350
Baader D-ERF 160MM
2xBaader 1.25 GPC
2xLunt 50mm
Lunt Cak B1200
Coronado BF15
Camera: Apollo Max 432M/ Apollo Mini 429M/Player One Mars II 462M/QHY 290MM
Mounh: 2xSky Watcher AZEQ6
Telecentric Lense: Televue Powermate 2/2.5x/4X/5X
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:42 am
- Location: Russia, Moscow
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
I also bought D-ERF 160mm from Baader for my TS152 f5.9 several years ago. It works very well and absolutely safety.
- Attachments
-
- IMG_1353-small.jpg (601.6 KiB) Viewed 1935 times
- Petrus
- Almost There...
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:14 pm
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 1496 times
- Been thanked: 684 times
- Contact:
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
Nice to see these! I wish things go well and I have the opportunity to get this full aperture D-ERF during this season.
~ Petrus ~
Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/people/194757663@N08/
LS80THa DSII - Calcium II K module 12mm - Lunt Herschel wedge 1.25" - Quark Chromosphere - Solarscout Quark - Sol'Ex
Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/people/194757663@N08/
LS80THa DSII - Calcium II K module 12mm - Lunt Herschel wedge 1.25" - Quark Chromosphere - Solarscout Quark - Sol'Ex
- Rusted
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1738
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 11:00 am
- Location: Central Denmark
- Has thanked: 8016 times
- Been thanked: 1938 times
- Contact:
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
At the risk of repetition: D-ERFs still pass some heat energy. Particularly with larger apertures.
Do not put your eye where you cannot hold your hand at focus!
Do not put your eye where you cannot hold your hand at focus!
http://fullerscopes.blogspot.dk/
H-alpha: Baader 160mm D-ERF, iStar 150/10 H-alpha objective, 2" Baader 35nm H-a, 2" Beloptik KG3,
Lunt 60MT etalon, Lunt B1200S2 BF, Assorted T-S GPCs or 2x "Shorty" Barlow, ZWO ASI174.
H-alpha: Baader 160mm D-ERF, iStar 150/10 H-alpha objective, 2" Baader 35nm H-a, 2" Beloptik KG3,
Lunt 60MT etalon, Lunt B1200S2 BF, Assorted T-S GPCs or 2x "Shorty" Barlow, ZWO ASI174.
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
Even if one can hold a hand, do not put your eyes there!
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42269
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20424 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
- Contact:
Re: Full aperture D-ERF vs sub-aperture D-ERF for TS 152mm f/5.9
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!