Today's SUN (20230609) | Player one Saturn-M SQR

[pedro]

Today's SUN (20230609) | Player one Saturn-M SQR

WEB LINK:
http://pedroreastrophotography.com/sun_ ... 23-06.html


Solar imaging session (20230609) | Pedro RE'
TV NP127 F/5.2| Player One Saturn-M SQR (H-alpha SS/DS)
http://pedroreastrophotography.com/


IMAGING SETUPS


IMAGING SETUPS


IMAGING SETUPS


IMAGING SETUPS


IMAGING SETUPS


SUN (20230609) H-alpha (15:30 UTC). TV NP127 F/5.2, DS SM90II/SM60, BF30, PLAYER ONE SATURN-M SQR


SUN (20230609) H-alpha (15:30 UTC). TV NP127 F/5.2, DS SM90II/SM60, BF30, PLAYER ONE SATURN-M SQR


SUN (20230609) H-alpha (15:30 UTC). TV NP127 F/5.2, SM60, BF30, PLAYER ONE SATURN-M SQR


SUN (20230609) H-alpha (15:30 UTC). TV NP127 F/5.2, SM60, BF30, PLAYER ONE SATURN-M SQR

[MAURITS]

Great disks Pedro.

[pedro]

Thanks Maurits

I'm loving the Player one camera

[pedro]

remote_20230609-10 by Pedro Re', on Flickr

remote_20230609-06 by Pedro Re', on Flickr

remote_20230609-07 by Pedro Re', on Flickr

[arnedanielsen]

Very nice Pedro!

Best regards,
Arne

[rigel123]

Nice ones Pedro!

[marktownley]

Nice disks Pedro!

[pedro]

Thanks guys

[BGazing]

Thanks Maurits

I'm loving the Player one camera

Better than 1600, I'd expect?
Why do you consider 533 to lack in DR, it has one and a half stop more at 0 gain, if I am not mistaken.

[Rusted]

Excellent results as we have come to expect from your work.

However, the very obvious increase in contrast, with Double Stacking, suggests a coarsening of detail, a roughening of the overall surface texture and considerable loss of dynamic range. e.g. The flaring seems overblown and the filaments are considerably broadened in DS.

Am I badly mistaken? This is not remotely meant as a criticism of your work. Which is always of the highest standard. It is more of a personal/subjective reaction to the first, comparison images placed side by side.