- 300/1200 uncoated Newtonian
- ASI 174 MM
- 0,5 ms - 4000/400 frames
- Baader Solar Continuum 2"
- average seeing - 20 km/h steady wind
Hi Alexandros,H-Alpha wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:59 pm Congratulations Laszlo!!!!!!!!!!
If this is average seeing, then what is the good one? This is perfect seeing, never seen by most of us, I think.
Did you take the photo from the peer in a lake? Is it the same scope that Christian had presented here one month (or so) ago?
I am really amazed by your instrument and skills and results. I am equally amazed by your seeing. I could not believe that far away from the ocean, in the middle of Europe, we could have such a stable seeing.
Best wishes,
Alexandros
Dear Laszlo,Laszlo Francsics wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 9:19 pm
Hi Alexandros,
there is a misunderstanding about the seeing. In Hungary the seeing is average or poor. We rarely have good seeing, because of the Carpatian-basin. Hence, it is necessary to avoid ground seeing. If one can deactivate groundseeing, the daylight seeing conditions are almost as good as during the night. For this good timing and location are crutial. Water surface, high hills, green surface, strong wind, high level cirri are key parameters. If the groundseeing can't be canceled, the outcome is catastrophic, many of the solar photographers experience that.
Christian Viladrich collected every necessary information in "Solar Astronomy" book.
Yes it is the same scope Christian pesented in a former post.
cheers,
Laszlo
Thanks a lot Laszlo for your answer and all the details.Laszlo Francsics wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 9:19 pm
Hi Alexandros,
there is a misunderstanding about the seeing. In Hungary the seeing is average or poor. We rarely have good seeing, because of the Carpatian-basin. Hence, it is necessary to avoid ground seeing. If one can deactivate groundseeing, the daylight seeing conditions are almost as good as during the night. For this good timing and location are crutial. Water surface, high hills, green surface, strong wind, high level cirri are key parameters. If the groundseeing can't be canceled, the outcome is catastrophic, many of the solar photographers experience that.
Christian Viladrich collected every necessary information in "Solar Astronomy" book.
Yes it is the same scope Christian pesented in a former post.
cheers,
Laszlo
Hi Alexandros,H-Alpha wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 12:26 amThanks a lot Laszlo for your answer and all the details.Laszlo Francsics wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 9:19 pm
Hi Alexandros,
there is a misunderstanding about the seeing. In Hungary the seeing is average or poor. We rarely have good seeing, because of the Carpatian-basin. Hence, it is necessary to avoid ground seeing. If one can deactivate groundseeing, the daylight seeing conditions are almost as good as during the night. For this good timing and location are crutial. Water surface, high hills, green surface, strong wind, high level cirri are key parameters. If the groundseeing can't be canceled, the outcome is catastrophic, many of the solar photographers experience that.
Christian Viladrich collected every necessary information in "Solar Astronomy" book.
Yes it is the same scope Christian pesented in a former post.
cheers,
Laszlo
Deactivating groundseeing is what I am trying all the last year by looking for appropriate locations in my country (Greece), which has an average/poor seeing in general. My balcony seems to be influenced a lot by the surrounding buildings, and I am trying to find the appropriate area in the countryside (where a good timing could provide satisfactory results), which is not easy.
This is why the work and experience of Christian and now your own experience and results as well are very precious for me, but for many other solar amateurs, I think.
You mentioned "strong winds" together with some positive factors like green surface etc. Unless I have completely misunderstood so far, I was thinking that the strong wind (at lower altitude and atmospheric levels, because it is well known that the jet-stream is a negative factor for seeing) is also creating a bad seeing. Isn't it? Did you mean the absence of strong winds?
Is the lake a place near where you live, or you ended up there after meticulous research and theoretical thought?
Anyway, whatever part of your experience regarding the seeing you can share, it will be really precious and welcome. Hope one day I can find a place like "your" lake, which could give results even half the way of the quality of your results. ;-)
Once more I wish to thank you and to congratulate you for your amazing results, and I am very glad you became part of the SolarChat community!
Best wishes,
Alexandros
PS: Strange things... I re-wrote my message because a while ago I could not see it, but now it appeared again! Sorry for the repetition...
Hi,
Laszlo you are very kind! Thanks sooooooo much!Laszlo Francsics wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:11 pm
Hi Alexandros,
Wind is important. Lack of wind kills solar photography, anytime, anywhere. The wind blows away low level turbulence, which is crutial for good resolution. In windy weather, the high level seeing can be little bit worse. But the benefit of deactivating the groundseeing is much bigger, than the loss of high level seeing.
I found my place after meticulous research and theoretical thought both. I've been searching for that certain place for years.
In Greece I would do the following: I would try to find a ridge or high point very close to and facing the sea, where wind comes from the direction of the sea, and there is nothing between you and the water. No other cliffs, buldings, hills. Thats all. Morning hours are better. Very stable equipment, strong mount is an advantage :-)
Laszlo