Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:06 pm
- Been thanked: 12 times
Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
Greetings Everyone,
I’m relative newcomer to H-Alpha Solar Imaging and Observing. The information on SolarChat is incredible. I was recently loaned a DayStar Quantum SE 0.7. I believe it is one of the older versions as it has the screw for the potentiometer on the housing. I’ve been using it over the last couple of weeks and have recorded and processed serval images using the following configuration:
DayStar Front Mounted ERF -> Astro-Physics Stowaway -> Tele Vue Power Mate 4X -> Daystar Quauntum SE -> ASI174MM Camera.
Seeing conditions were reported by Clear Sky Chart to be average.
There’s been some discussion on this forum regarding the performance of the Quantum Filter. As I am new to Solar Observing, I do not know how judge the performance of the filter. I recorded several images via AutoStakkert!. JPEG versions of the results are shown below. There are a couple colorized ones too via IMPPG->Topaz AI->Photoshop. I am very interested in your feedback as to whether or not the filter performs as you would expect. Your thoughts will be most appreciated.
Thanks,
Shawn
I’m relative newcomer to H-Alpha Solar Imaging and Observing. The information on SolarChat is incredible. I was recently loaned a DayStar Quantum SE 0.7. I believe it is one of the older versions as it has the screw for the potentiometer on the housing. I’ve been using it over the last couple of weeks and have recorded and processed serval images using the following configuration:
DayStar Front Mounted ERF -> Astro-Physics Stowaway -> Tele Vue Power Mate 4X -> Daystar Quauntum SE -> ASI174MM Camera.
Seeing conditions were reported by Clear Sky Chart to be average.
There’s been some discussion on this forum regarding the performance of the Quantum Filter. As I am new to Solar Observing, I do not know how judge the performance of the filter. I recorded several images via AutoStakkert!. JPEG versions of the results are shown below. There are a couple colorized ones too via IMPPG->Topaz AI->Photoshop. I am very interested in your feedback as to whether or not the filter performs as you would expect. Your thoughts will be most appreciated.
Thanks,
Shawn
- Attachments
-
- 11_47_42_lapl5_ap327_Drizzle15_IMPPG-topaz-denoise-enhance-sharpen copy_CMP.jpg (2.15 MiB) Viewed 609 times
-
- 11_11_53_lapl4_ap420_Drizzle15.jpg (247.41 KiB) Viewed 609 times
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34722
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17974 times
- Been thanked: 8906 times
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
A very warm and sunny welcome Shawn what a stunning set of images, you can certainly produce a very fine set
As regards the filter performance, it is a 0.7A so will never have much contrast, it is not bad (fairly uniform), but perhaps not quite as on band as it could be, have you tried a few heating settings? I would try increments of half a degree or a degree each way over about +/- 3 degrees. Take an image at each of these settings using either an active region or filament (not a prominence). Line the images up after processing (don't use a flat) and use the same processing conditions. This way you will be able to judge at which point the filter is most on band (most contrast). This is the best way to judge. I did this with a Quark and a Solarspectrum to gauge where the best setting was. https://solarnutcase.livejournal.com/12257.html
Alexandra
As regards the filter performance, it is a 0.7A so will never have much contrast, it is not bad (fairly uniform), but perhaps not quite as on band as it could be, have you tried a few heating settings? I would try increments of half a degree or a degree each way over about +/- 3 degrees. Take an image at each of these settings using either an active region or filament (not a prominence). Line the images up after processing (don't use a flat) and use the same processing conditions. This way you will be able to judge at which point the filter is most on band (most contrast). This is the best way to judge. I did this with a Quark and a Solarspectrum to gauge where the best setting was. https://solarnutcase.livejournal.com/12257.html
Alexandra
- rigel123
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 7486
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2021 9:26 pm
- Location: Mason, OH
- Has thanked: 8576 times
- Been thanked: 8810 times
- Contact:
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
I agree with Alexandra, you are getting some good images and may be able to get a bit more contrast out of your filter by following her example. Welcome!
Warren
Lunt LS60T DS
Orion ED80T CF
Meade ETX LS6
Lunt CaK BF1200
Lunt WL Wedge
Baader Photographic Film
ASI174MM
Skyris 236M
Player One Saturn-M SQR
https://www.astrobin.com/users/rigel123/
Lunt LS60T DS
Orion ED80T CF
Meade ETX LS6
Lunt CaK BF1200
Lunt WL Wedge
Baader Photographic Film
ASI174MM
Skyris 236M
Player One Saturn-M SQR
https://www.astrobin.com/users/rigel123/
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42550
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20819 times
- Been thanked: 10489 times
- Contact:
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
Hi Shawn and welcome to the forum!
These are nice first shots. Like Alexandra says you are a tiny bit off band, and bracketing tuning will allow you to find that best contrast position.
Based on the images the filter appears to perform similarly to a decent Quark prominence model. Are you looking to buy a Ha filter?
Mark
These are nice first shots. Like Alexandra says you are a tiny bit off band, and bracketing tuning will allow you to find that best contrast position.
Based on the images the filter appears to perform similarly to a decent Quark prominence model. Are you looking to buy a Ha filter?
Mark
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:06 pm
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
Folks,
Thanks for the your comments and thoughts on next steps. I will try your suggestions changing the heating settings (thanks Alexandra!). Your feedback is most appreciated!
The sun is very 'cool' right now:)
Shawn
Thanks for the your comments and thoughts on next steps. I will try your suggestions changing the heating settings (thanks Alexandra!). Your feedback is most appreciated!
The sun is very 'cool' right now:)
Shawn
- DeepSolar64
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 19068
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2019 12:19 am
- Location: Lowndesville S.C.
- Has thanked: 17853 times
- Been thanked: 16996 times
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
It should do decent on the disc but not as good as a 0.5A filter or doublestack setup but it should do really well on prominences. Your images resemble my 0.65A single stacked images but are more uniform than mine are.
James
James
Lunt 8x32 SUNoculars
Orion 70mm Solar Telescope
Celestron AstroMaster Alt/Az Mount
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 60 DS
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 90 DS
Meade Coronado AZS Alt/Az Mount
Astro-Tech AT72EDII with Altair solar wedge
Celestron NexStar 102GT with Altair solar wedge
Losmandy AZ8 Alt/Az Mount
Sky-Watcher AZGTI Alt-Az GoTo mount
Cameras: ZWO ASI178MM, PGR Grasshopper, PGR Flea
Lunt, Coronado, TeleVue, Orion and Meade eyepieces
Visual Observer
" Way more fun to see it! "
Orion 70mm Solar Telescope
Celestron AstroMaster Alt/Az Mount
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 60 DS
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 90 DS
Meade Coronado AZS Alt/Az Mount
Astro-Tech AT72EDII with Altair solar wedge
Celestron NexStar 102GT with Altair solar wedge
Losmandy AZ8 Alt/Az Mount
Sky-Watcher AZGTI Alt-Az GoTo mount
Cameras: ZWO ASI178MM, PGR Grasshopper, PGR Flea
Lunt, Coronado, TeleVue, Orion and Meade eyepieces
Visual Observer
" Way more fun to see it! "
- MAURITS
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 8615
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 4:37 pm
- Location: Belgium
- Has thanked: 2464 times
- Been thanked: 4880 times
- Contact:
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
Welcome Shawn, nice to see your images with a 0.7A Daystar.
I have about the same Ha filter but from SolarSpectrum, so in the end I have double stack it.
I have about the same Ha filter but from SolarSpectrum, so in the end I have double stack it.
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:06 pm
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
Hi Maurits,
I understand double stacking with pressure based etalons. Not sure I follow with a SolarSpectrum. How do you accomplish double stacking in a configuration with the SolarSpectrum filter (or Quantum)?
Thanks in advance.
Shawn
I understand double stacking with pressure based etalons. Not sure I follow with a SolarSpectrum. How do you accomplish double stacking in a configuration with the SolarSpectrum filter (or Quantum)?
Thanks in advance.
Shawn
- MapleRidge
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 10257
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:58 pm
- Location: Cambray, ON Canada
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 4427 times
- Contact:
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
Hi Shawn...
Welcome to the group !
The proms show quite well and the wider band-pass of this filter matches up pretty well with this, but I agree that some adjustment of the heater could improve the chromosphere contrast with this filter.
Even a 0.7A filter will be a great instrument, so I would suggest refining its use. The double stack idea will narrow the band-pass down to provide greater contrast on the chromosphereic filters, but that would be stage two. This will provide time to evaluate the ability of this filter and sort out options to double stack it should you choose to do so.
Brian
Welcome to the group !
The proms show quite well and the wider band-pass of this filter matches up pretty well with this, but I agree that some adjustment of the heater could improve the chromosphere contrast with this filter.
Even a 0.7A filter will be a great instrument, so I would suggest refining its use. The double stack idea will narrow the band-pass down to provide greater contrast on the chromosphereic filters, but that would be stage two. This will provide time to evaluate the ability of this filter and sort out options to double stack it should you choose to do so.
Brian
Brian Colville
Maple Ridge Observatory
Cambray, ON Canada
Photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185395281@N08/albums
10'x15 Roll-off Roof Observatory
Takahashi EM400 Mount carrying:
C14 + Lunt 80ED
Deep Sky Work - ASI294MM Pro+EFW 7x36/Canon 60D (Ha mod), ONAG
Planetary Work - SBIG CFW10, ASI462MM
2.2m Diameter Dome
iOptron CEM70G Mount carrying:
Orion EON 130ED, f7 OTA for Day & Night Use
Ha Setup: Lunt LS80PT/LS75FHa/B1200Ha + Home Brew Lunt Double Stack/B1800Ha on the Orion OTA + Daystar Quantum
WL, G-Band & CaK Setup: Lunt Wedge & Lunt B1800CaK, Baader K-Line and Altair 2nm G-Band filter
ASI1600MM, ASI432MM, ASI294MM Pro, ASI174MM, ASI462MM
Maple Ridge Observatory
Cambray, ON Canada
Photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185395281@N08/albums
10'x15 Roll-off Roof Observatory
Takahashi EM400 Mount carrying:
C14 + Lunt 80ED
Deep Sky Work - ASI294MM Pro+EFW 7x36/Canon 60D (Ha mod), ONAG
Planetary Work - SBIG CFW10, ASI462MM
2.2m Diameter Dome
iOptron CEM70G Mount carrying:
Orion EON 130ED, f7 OTA for Day & Night Use
Ha Setup: Lunt LS80PT/LS75FHa/B1200Ha + Home Brew Lunt Double Stack/B1800Ha on the Orion OTA + Daystar Quantum
WL, G-Band & CaK Setup: Lunt Wedge & Lunt B1800CaK, Baader K-Line and Altair 2nm G-Band filter
ASI1600MM, ASI432MM, ASI294MM Pro, ASI174MM, ASI462MM
- MAURITS
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 8615
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 4:37 pm
- Location: Belgium
- Has thanked: 2464 times
- Been thanked: 4880 times
- Contact:
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
Hi Shawn,Shawn_Quinn wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:09 pm Hi Maurits,
I understand double stacking with pressure based etalons. Not sure I follow with a SolarSpectrum. How do you accomplish double stacking in a configuration with the SolarSpectrum filter (or Quantum)?
Thanks in advance.
Shawn
To double stack the SolarSpectrum or Quantum ... I have used a SolarScope Etalon for double stack in a 2inch cell with T2 thread on both ends.
The etalon has an in-build tilt function for tuning.
I have place it just before my SolarSpectrum 0.7A Ha filter on the telescope side.
FRONT BACK
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 811 times
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
Hi Shawn,
The mica etalon filters are the most difficult type of solar filter to optimize the performance. Given the circumstances, you seem to be getting what one would expect.
1. The Powermate Barlow is not a true telecentric lens system, and will not be able to deliver true telecentric lens performance.
Baader Planetarium
Ideally, to get the best telecentric performance you'd use the Baader TZ4 and properly locate it in a fixed position. Per Baader, optimum telecentricity will occur when the instrumental prime focus of the objective lies exactly 93 mm behind the front of the TZ4:
Baader Planetarium
You'd then place the etalon, and after that have a focuser for an eyepiece of camera. Unfortunately, DayStar provides no such optimization information for their filter systems, and there is no such information for using the TeleVue Powermates. But what applies for the Baader Solar Spectrum filter systems equally applies to the DayStar filter systems.
2, Review the work of Christian Viladrich on etalon performance. With the Stowaway's f6.65 focal ratio, with the TZ4 your EFR is ~27, and the very best FWHM of a true 0.7 A filter would be ~ 0.84 A. Compounded by the fact you're not using a optimized true telecentric, you're likely closer to FWHM of 0.9 A with the Powermate.
To get anywhere near a FWHM of 0.7 A you have to be closer to f50:
Christian Viladrich
As noted previously, adjusting the etalon temperature will need to be played with to find your system configuration's optimal performance. The filter band-pass will widen per above and the filter will be shifted off-band into the blue wing a lesser f ratios, and fine tuning the temperature for these conditions will improve performance. Given the lower f ratio, you generally would need to adjust the temperature upward to shift the etalon CWL higher. Since the wavelength indicator (if present) is based on a temperature setting, it would need to be higher than the nominal 6562.8 A.
Christian Viladrich (reordered)
Given that you have only borrowed the filter, I'm not sure how much you'd want to invest in all this, or a secondary filter to double stack with, which will significantly add to the complexity of the system...
Best wishes,
Bob
The mica etalon filters are the most difficult type of solar filter to optimize the performance. Given the circumstances, you seem to be getting what one would expect.
1. The Powermate Barlow is not a true telecentric lens system, and will not be able to deliver true telecentric lens performance.
Baader Planetarium
Ideally, to get the best telecentric performance you'd use the Baader TZ4 and properly locate it in a fixed position. Per Baader, optimum telecentricity will occur when the instrumental prime focus of the objective lies exactly 93 mm behind the front of the TZ4:
Baader Planetarium
You'd then place the etalon, and after that have a focuser for an eyepiece of camera. Unfortunately, DayStar provides no such optimization information for their filter systems, and there is no such information for using the TeleVue Powermates. But what applies for the Baader Solar Spectrum filter systems equally applies to the DayStar filter systems.
2, Review the work of Christian Viladrich on etalon performance. With the Stowaway's f6.65 focal ratio, with the TZ4 your EFR is ~27, and the very best FWHM of a true 0.7 A filter would be ~ 0.84 A. Compounded by the fact you're not using a optimized true telecentric, you're likely closer to FWHM of 0.9 A with the Powermate.
To get anywhere near a FWHM of 0.7 A you have to be closer to f50:
Christian Viladrich
As noted previously, adjusting the etalon temperature will need to be played with to find your system configuration's optimal performance. The filter band-pass will widen per above and the filter will be shifted off-band into the blue wing a lesser f ratios, and fine tuning the temperature for these conditions will improve performance. Given the lower f ratio, you generally would need to adjust the temperature upward to shift the etalon CWL higher. Since the wavelength indicator (if present) is based on a temperature setting, it would need to be higher than the nominal 6562.8 A.
Christian Viladrich (reordered)
Given that you have only borrowed the filter, I'm not sure how much you'd want to invest in all this, or a secondary filter to double stack with, which will significantly add to the complexity of the system...
Best wishes,
Bob
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:06 pm
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
Folks,
I'd like to thank everyone for their very thoughtful and comprehensive technical responses! I'm still having fun with the borrowed filter and hope to one day have the necessary filters to use on my A-P Stowaway and A-P 130GTX. The sun is pretty amazing right now!
Shawn
I'd like to thank everyone for their very thoughtful and comprehensive technical responses! I'm still having fun with the borrowed filter and hope to one day have the necessary filters to use on my A-P Stowaway and A-P 130GTX. The sun is pretty amazing right now!
Shawn
- DeepSolar64
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 19068
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2019 12:19 am
- Location: Lowndesville S.C.
- Has thanked: 17853 times
- Been thanked: 16996 times
Re: Daystar Quantum SE .7 Testing - Feedback Request
WoW. You have two AP refractors. Awesome!!
Lunt 8x32 SUNoculars
Orion 70mm Solar Telescope
Celestron AstroMaster Alt/Az Mount
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 60 DS
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 90 DS
Meade Coronado AZS Alt/Az Mount
Astro-Tech AT72EDII with Altair solar wedge
Celestron NexStar 102GT with Altair solar wedge
Losmandy AZ8 Alt/Az Mount
Sky-Watcher AZGTI Alt-Az GoTo mount
Cameras: ZWO ASI178MM, PGR Grasshopper, PGR Flea
Lunt, Coronado, TeleVue, Orion and Meade eyepieces
Visual Observer
" Way more fun to see it! "
Orion 70mm Solar Telescope
Celestron AstroMaster Alt/Az Mount
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 60 DS
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 90 DS
Meade Coronado AZS Alt/Az Mount
Astro-Tech AT72EDII with Altair solar wedge
Celestron NexStar 102GT with Altair solar wedge
Losmandy AZ8 Alt/Az Mount
Sky-Watcher AZGTI Alt-Az GoTo mount
Cameras: ZWO ASI178MM, PGR Grasshopper, PGR Flea
Lunt, Coronado, TeleVue, Orion and Meade eyepieces
Visual Observer
" Way more fun to see it! "