Choosing herschel
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: Choosing herschel
I can't believe no one answered this, so i hope you will get your answer.
I posted or commented here only to say that recently i asked people on Facebook about Lunt Wedge 1.25" because i don't want to go with Baader Herschel which is so expensive as a wedge really, but sounds 1.25" version of Lunt isn't recommended, you mentioned about short focus travel, another one mentioned about heat resistance performance compared to 2", so i think i should just go directly to 2" version and never look back, but Baader one is the best out there, but pricey, so i either wait to afford it, or just buy any other 2" Herschel that is a bit cheaper than Baader one.
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2023 7:25 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Choosing herschel
Hi,
Thanks for your answer. I too think Baader 2" is the best but a bit pricey.
For the moment i play with my quark and lunt 50, i looking for a good classified (Baader or Lunt).
Thanks for your answer. I too think Baader 2" is the best but a bit pricey.
For the moment i play with my quark and lunt 50, i looking for a good classified (Baader or Lunt).
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: Choosing herschel
I want to complete the three known solar filters so WL is one of them, and all said that it is the best done with Herschel Wedge, i already have the Quark since last year and CaK since this year but i didn't play with any yet for some reasons, i will finish scopes choices then i will use them all.
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2023 7:25 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Choosing herschel
You're right and CaK seems very interesting, so Herschel is necessary (or a quark but not the same price).
I tried pst, lunt 50, lunt 50 mod and quark and for the moment the easier for me is the quark.
I tried pst, lunt 50, lunt 50 mod and quark and for the moment the easier for me is the quark.
- rigel123
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2021 9:26 pm
- Location: Mason, OH
- Has thanked: 7138 times
- Been thanked: 7472 times
- Contact:
Re: Choosing herschel
I have the Lunt 1.25 that I use with my Orion ED80T with no issues. What scope are you using yours with?
Warren
Lunt LS60T DS
Orion ED80T CF
Meade ETX LS6
Lunt CaK BF1200
Lunt WL Wedge
Baader Photographic Film
ASI174MM
Skyris 236M
https://www.astrobin.com/users/rigel123/
Lunt LS60T DS
Orion ED80T CF
Meade ETX LS6
Lunt CaK BF1200
Lunt WL Wedge
Baader Photographic Film
ASI174MM
Skyris 236M
https://www.astrobin.com/users/rigel123/
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2023 7:25 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Choosing herschel
I use a takahashi fc-100-df, the focus travel is a problem with 1,25".
@TareqPhoto i start quark before installing my setup and it's easy to find the sun before mounting quark.
And because i'm a fan of big magnification for sun quark is ideal.
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: Choosing herschel
Ok, i will give it a try one day and see, i only did with Antlia Herschel Wedge and CaK filter and it was easy to do really.
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2023 7:25 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Choosing herschel
I have an other project for white light, with a 10x bino.
Initially i wanted to buy Thousand Oaks threaded filters but i live in Europe and shipping costs are very high. I found an alternative with Astrozap, but is it as good as TO ?
Or Baader astrosolar is the best solution ? I have a preference for glass over film but perhaps am i wrong.
If some members have advices...
Initially i wanted to buy Thousand Oaks threaded filters but i live in Europe and shipping costs are very high. I found an alternative with Astrozap, but is it as good as TO ?
Or Baader astrosolar is the best solution ? I have a preference for glass over film but perhaps am i wrong.
If some members have advices...
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: Choosing herschel
If i can remember well, the wedge is better than solar film, this is one thing, second thing is, the film is better than glass, almost all mentioned that, so your first choice is the herschel wedge then the second one is film, now which film....?
If i have to put them in order then i will put Baader as first, then Astrozap second, Thousands Oaks is very nice one but i see more solar film used by users from Baader and Astrozap than Thousands Oaks.
If i have to put them in order then i will put Baader as first, then Astrozap second, Thousands Oaks is very nice one but i see more solar film used by users from Baader and Astrozap than Thousands Oaks.
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 41186
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 18803 times
- Been thanked: 9309 times
- Contact:
Re: Choosing herschel
Yup!

http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:40 am
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
- OlegLviv
- Almost There...
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 4:24 am
- Location: Ukraine/Lviv
- Has thanked: 763 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: Choosing herschel
Baader Prism Hershel 2.0 best of the best! Thank you!!
https://www.facebook.com/oleg.lavigne/
https://www.astrobin.com/users/RamonLviv/
https://www.astroclub.kiev.ua/forum/ind ... ic=46758.0
Telescope: TS 152/900
Baader D-ERF 160MM
Baader 1.25 GPC
Lunt 50mm
Coronado BF15
Camera: Apollo Max 432M/QHY 290MM
Mounh: Sky Watcher AZEQ6
Telecentric Lense: Televue Powermate 2.5x/4X/5X
https://www.astrobin.com/users/RamonLviv/
https://www.astroclub.kiev.ua/forum/ind ... ic=46758.0
Telescope: TS 152/900
Baader D-ERF 160MM
Baader 1.25 GPC
Lunt 50mm
Coronado BF15
Camera: Apollo Max 432M/QHY 290MM
Mounh: Sky Watcher AZEQ6
Telecentric Lense: Televue Powermate 2.5x/4X/5X
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 33813
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 16252 times
- Been thanked: 8266 times
Re: Choosing herschel
Best would be Continuum filter for seeing granulation detail. I've only ever used the Baader version and this is great. However, I recently purchased the Altair G-Band filter and this is like a cross between Continuum and Calcium, the granulation is very sharp and obvious and you can see faculae well into the middle of the disc. However, the spot penumbra and umbra is much darker.
Alexandra
Alexandra
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 41186
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 18803 times
- Been thanked: 9309 times
- Contact:
Re: Choosing herschel
Polarising and continuum filters are completely different that do completely different things...

http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2023 7:25 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Choosing herschel
You're right, during this time i read some articles about each one and the continuum would be the best choice for me. But it seems to be marginal in quality result for visual, better for photo and altair seems to be slightly better.
Users' experiences remain the best way in my opinion.
Users' experiences remain the best way in my opinion.
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 33813
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 16252 times
- Been thanked: 8266 times
Re: Choosing herschel
Here is a thread to show you images of the differences. There is no brand difference, it is wavelength that matters and give different visual effects. A polarising filter is a completely different thing again and will reduce glare if you are finding visual too bright.
viewtopic.php?p=385824&hilit=g+band#p385824
Alexandra
viewtopic.php?p=385824&hilit=g+band#p385824
Alexandra
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 33813
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 16252 times
- Been thanked: 8266 times
Re: Choosing herschel
Others have looked visually and enjoyed the view. The faculae stands out more.
Alexandra
Alexandra
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 33813
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 16252 times
- Been thanked: 8266 times
Re: Choosing herschel
The 1.25" just screws on the eyepiece or camera nose, there is no need for a 2"
Alexandra
Alexandra